Can Differentiation Under the Integral Sign Solve Regular Curves Family Length?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Demon117
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curves Regular
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on differentiating under the integral sign to derive the length of a one-parameter family of regular curves defined by the equation L(ε) = ∫ab|d/ds αε| ds. The key result established is L'(0) = -∫ab kα f(s) ds, where kα represents the curvature of the curve α. Participants emphasized the importance of correctly applying differentiation techniques, particularly in handling the modulus within the integral. The discussion concluded with a consensus on utilizing inner product definitions to simplify the differentiation process.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of regular curves and arc length parametrization
  • Familiarity with the concept of curvature in differential geometry
  • Knowledge of differentiation under the integral sign
  • Proficiency in inner product spaces and their applications
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the Leibniz rule for differentiation under the integral sign
  • Explore the properties of curvature in regular curves using differential geometry
  • Learn about inner product spaces and their role in simplifying calculus operations
  • Practice problems involving the differentiation of integrals with modulus functions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of differential geometry, and anyone interested in advanced calculus techniques related to curve analysis and integral calculus.

Demon117
Messages
162
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Let \alpha : I =[a,b]→R^{2} be a rgular curve parametrized by arc length s. Let f:I→R be a differentiable function with f(a)=f(b)=0. For small values of \epsilon

\alpha_{\epsilon}:=\alpha (s) + \epsilon f(s) N(s)

defines a one parameter family of regular curves having endpoints \alpha(a) and \alpha(b). The length of these curves defines a function

L(\epsilon):=L_{a}^{b}(\alpha_{\epsilon})=\int_{a}^{b} \left|\frac{d}{ds}\alpha_{\epsilon}\right| ds

By differentiating under the integral sign, show that

L'(0)=-\int_{a}^{b}k_{\alpha}f(s)ds

where k_{\alpha} is the curvature of the function \alpha.

The Attempt at a Solution



My attempt at the solution is somewhat limited to purely differentiating the term inside the integrand. I merely want to check that I am approaching this the right way. What I have so far is the following. Since the term k_{\alpha}f(s) is continuous we can differentiate under the integral sign. We have therefore,

\frac{d}{ds}\alpha_{\epsilon}=\alpha'(s)+\epsilon [f'(s)N(s)+f(s)N'(s)]

=\alpha'(s)+\epsilon [f'(s)N(s)+f(s)(-k_{\alpha}(s)T(s))]

Where T(s) is the tangent to the curve \alpha. Furthermore, this gives

\alpha'(s)+\epsilon [f'(s)(\frac{1}{k_{\alpha}(s)}T'(s)+f(s)(-k_{\alpha}(s)\alpha'(s))]

=\alpha'(s)+\epsilon [f'(s)(\frac{1}{k_{\alpha}(s)}\alpha''(s)+f(s)(-k_{\alpha}(s)\alpha'(s))]

Now this is where it gets tricky. I want to show

L'(0)=-\int_{a}^{b}k_{\alpha}f(s)ds

which implies that I look at the derivative of the function at \epsilon=0. But how would one differentiate \left|\frac{d}{ds}\alpha_{\epsilon}\right| with the "modulus" present?
Either I am over complicating this or I have simply forgotten this sort of exercise from previous work. . . Suggestions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I realize what my problem was now. I took a wrong turn and now realize that I must next differentiate with respect to \epsilon then take the limit as \epsilon approaches zero. Furthermore I could get away with utilizing the definition of the inner product \left|\frac{d}{ds}\alpha_{\epsilon}(s)\right|=\sqrt{<\frac{d}{ds}\alpha_{\epsilon}(s),\frac{d}{ds}\alpha_{\epsilon}(s)>}.

Following through with some differentiation on s and then differentiation the inner product with respect to \epsilon; things simplify quite a bit once the limit is taken. The result immediately pops out after some useful inner product applications. Now to write down a rigorous proof of this.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K