julesh
- 6
- 0
Is there any particular reason why entropy could not be a measure of or proxy for the level of competition within a system?
you are begging the question.julesh said:The state of maximum competition is the same as the state of maximum entropy.
This doesn't make a lot of sense to compare: competition has rules, entropy does not.julesh said:Summary:: Is there any particular reason why entropy could not be a measure of or proxy for the level of competition within a system?
Is there any particular reason why entropy could not be a measure of or proxy for the level of competition within a system?
Not sure I follow. How does maximum competition lead to maximum dispersal?julesh said:Begging the question or not, maximum competition and maximum entropy both result in the same situation of complete dispersal of energy (or money) throughout all agents in the systems.
julesh said:Boltzman's maths would predict the same result in both cases.
How does that jive with post 8?julesh said:...through competition between the agents money becomes evenly dispersed throughout the system. ..
Indeed. But in perfect competition, assume all agents are the same.DaveC426913 said:How does that jive with post 8?
If one agent has excellent skills compared to the others, the resources will not end up evenly dispersed.
That pretty much applies to all of economics.Vanadium 50 said:...concluding you are pushing your own personal theory.
If we have to add such an unrealistic and unilateral condition, then what value does the thesis provide?julesh said:Indeed. But in perfect competition, assume all agents are the same.
Entropy has a precise mathematical definition: it is ##K\ln\Omega##. There is no comparable definition for “level of competition”, and without that clarity about the terms being used it is difficult to have a useful discussion.julesh said:Is there any particular reason why entropy could not be a measure of or proxy for the level of competition within a system?