Can fast objects get cooked by Cosmic Microwave background?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the implications of relativistic speeds on the detection of gamma rays by a spacecraft's gamma ray detector in the context of the cosmic microwave background (CMB). As the spacecraft moves at relativistic speeds, the CMB is blue-shifted into higher energy photons, including gamma rays, from the perspective of the ship. The conversation highlights the role of the relativistic Doppler effect and the Lorentz transformations in understanding how different frames of reference perceive photon energy levels. Ultimately, both observers agree that the gamma ray detector on the spacecraft would register detections, despite the absence of gamma radiation in the planet's frame of reference.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of relativistic physics and the principles of special relativity
  • Familiarity with the relativistic Doppler effect
  • Knowledge of gamma ray detection methods, such as Compton scattering
  • Basic grasp of Lorentz transformations and their applications
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the relativistic Doppler effect and its mathematical formulation
  • Study gamma ray detection techniques, focusing on Compton scattering
  • Explore the implications of Lorentz transformations in different reference frames
  • Investigate the properties of the cosmic microwave background and its interaction with high-speed objects
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, astrophysicists, and students of relativity interested in the effects of relativistic speeds on photon detection and the behavior of light in varying frames of reference.

jfizzix
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Messages
757
Reaction score
356
Awhile ago, I was considering what sort of dangers a spacecraft moving at relativistic speeds would face in interstellar space. Aside from the obvious pieces of space dust being relativistic bullets in the ship's frame of reference, the cosmic microwave background (CMB) would become a big problem.

In particular the CMB in front of the ship would be blue-shifted into the infrared, visible, ultraviolet, and beyond.
Let's say we put a gamma ray detector on this ship; something whose chemical composition changes by exposure to gamma radiation, but not with lower energy photons. Then, in the ship's frame of reference, it will start detecting gamma rays from the CMB. However, in say, a planet's frame of reference, the CMB is just microwaves, while the ship is moving very fast.

My question is this
: How can a gamma ray detector record gamma rays that exist in one frame of reference, but not in others? Surely the detector must register detections in both reference frames, even if where and when those events take place is frame-dependent. However, in the planet's frame of reference, there's no gamma radiation for the detector to detect (it all being microwaves instead).
It seems a conundrum...
 
Science news on Phys.org
Perhaps I'm missing something but it seems to me that your argument is exactly the same as saying that since a swimmer can move about freely on the surface of a lake, it is bizarre that a person hitting it at 500 mph would feel it like at brick wall.
 
phinds said:
Perhaps I'm missing something but it seems to me that your argument is exactly the same as saying that since a swimmer can move about freely on the surface of a lake, it is bizarre that a person hitting it at 500 mph would feel it like at brick wall.

It's a bit different because the speed of the photons in the "cosmic lake" is a constant in both reference frames. In neither frame would the ship be smacking into a wall of photons because light doesn't pile up in front of a spaceship the way sound might (or maybe it does?).
What's different between the frames (among other things) is due to the relativistic Doppler effect.
 
I don't really understand how gamma rays are detected (Compton ray scattering) so I'll use visible light instead. The extrapolation should still be valid though.

If you're viewing a spaceship going close to the speed of light with respect to your reference frame on a planet then you will observe the spaceship's visible light detector (the Captain's eyeball) going close to the speed of light as well. In order for the cones and rays in the captain's eyeballs to register a photon, it must encounter a photon with just the right amount of energy to kick an electron in a retinal molecule into a higher energy state.

When the Captain is encountering those cool microwaves in front of the ship, because the Captain is going so fast those photons only need a tiny amount of energy to kick the retinal electron into a higher energy state. Most of the energy is provided by the Captain, while only a tiny amount is provided by the photon.

Keep in mind that everything I just described is from the frame of reference of the planetside observer.

From the Captain's perspective, he is absolutely still. The photon distribution in front has been piled up into a higher energy band (visible light), while the photon distribution behind him has been lowered such that it becomes difficult, if not impossible to measure.
Those visible light photons give just enough energy to kick an electron into the higher energy state, which transforms the retinal molecule into a different, more stable shape, which triggers a protein conformation that triggers an electrical pulse to the brain.

I believe you need the Lorentz transformations to figure out mathematically exactly what's going on.
 
jfizzix said:
My question is this: How can a gamma ray detector record gamma rays that exist in one frame of reference, but not in others? Surely the detector must register detections in both reference frames, even if where and when those events take place is frame-dependent. However, in the planet's frame of reference, there's no gamma radiation for the detector to detect (it all being microwaves instead). It seems a conundrum...

Both would agree that the gamma ray detector should register detections. The person on the planet, knowing how to calculate events in the spacecraft 's frame of reference, would determine that gamma rays would be encountered there even though they are not in his frame of reference.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K