Can Gauss-Jordan Elimination Help Me Find the Inverse of a 2x2 Matrix?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the inverse of a 2x2 matrix using Gauss-Jordan elimination. Participants are engaged in algebraic manipulation and exploring the steps involved in the process.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants share their progress with the elimination process, questioning specific algebraic steps and expressing concerns about the complexity of the calculations. There is a focus on ensuring accuracy in the manipulation of matrix elements.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided feedback on the algebraic steps taken, suggesting corrections and clarifications. There appears to be ongoing exploration of the correct approach to achieve the desired matrix form, with no explicit consensus reached on the final outcome.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating through potentially messy algebra and are concerned about keeping track of variables. There is an acknowledgment of the challenges posed by the calculations involved in the Gauss-Jordan elimination method.

hoffmann
Messages
65
Reaction score
0
I need to find the inverse of a 2x2 matrix [a b ; c d] using Gauss-Jordan elimination.

I am halfway there but I'm stuck on the algebra because it gets really messy. Could anyone possibly do it step by step?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why don't you show us what you've got so far?
 
sure:

[ a b ; c d | 1 0 ; 0 1 ] -->
[ a b ; (ac/c) (ad/c) | 1 0 ; 0 (a/c) ] -->
[ a b ; 0 ((ad/c)/c) -b | -1 (a/c) ] -->
...

here's where I'm a little stuck. I'm bad at keeping track of every variable...i think i miss something along the way because of the messy algebra.
 
Assuming that your last line is supposed to be:
\begin{pmatrix} a & b &1 & 0 \\ 0 & \frac{ad}{c}-b & -1 & \frac{a}{c} \end{pmatrix}

then your doing fine so far. what is your next step?
 
here it is:

[ (a(((ad/c)-b)/b) (((ad/c)-b)/b) ; 0 ((ad/c) -b) | (((ad/c)-b)/b) 0 ; -1 (a/c) ]

look good?
 
Are you multiplying the top row by (ad/c-b)/b ? If so, you should get:
<br /> \begin{pmatrix} \frac{a(\frac{ad}{c}-b)}{b} &amp; (\frac{ad}{c}-b) &amp;\frac{(\frac{ad}{c}-b)}{b} &amp; 0 \\ 0 &amp; \frac{ad}{c}-b &amp; -1 &amp; \frac{a}{c} \end{pmatrix}<br />
 
ah right, so the next step is:

[ (a(((ad/c)-b)/b) - (((ad/c)-b)) 0 ; 0 ((ad/c) -b) | ((((ad/c)-b)/b) - (ad/c) -b) 0 ; -1 (a/c) ]

it's messy this way...sorry.
 
Wouldn't the step be to subtract the bottom row from the top row to get:
\begin{pmatrix} \frac{a(\frac{ad}{c}-b)}{b} &amp; 0 &amp;\frac{(\frac{ad}{c}-b)}{b}+1 &amp; \frac{-1}{c} \\ 0 &amp; \frac{ad}{c}-b &amp; -1 &amp; \frac{a}{c} \end{pmatrix}=\begin{pmatrix} \frac{a(\frac{ad}{c}-b)}{b} &amp; 0 &amp;\frac{ad}{bc} &amp; \frac{-1}{c} \\ 0 &amp; \frac{ad}{c}-b &amp; -1 &amp; \frac{a}{c} \end{pmatrix}
 
alright, so now we have a matrix with zeros along the anti-diagonal. the inverse doesn't equal the inverse given by the 2x2 inverse formula. what went wrong?
 
  • #10
You still have to set the diagonal elements to 1: simply multiply the top row by b/(a(ad/c-b)) and the bottom row by 1/(ad/c-b)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
11K