Inverse of a 3x3 matrix of trigometric functions

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The original poster is attempting to find the inverse of a 3x3 matrix composed of trigonometric functions. The matrix includes terms involving sine and cosine, and the context suggests a focus on methods suitable for handling such expressions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster considers using Gauss-Jordan elimination but expresses concerns about the complexity of the expressions involved. A participant suggests making substitutions for sine and cosine to simplify the process. Another participant points out a misunderstanding regarding the orthogonality of the matrix, which leads to further clarification about the matrix's properties.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active with participants exploring different approaches to finding the inverse of the matrix. There is a recognition of the potential simplification through substitutions, and a clarification regarding the orthogonality of the matrix has been raised, indicating a productive exchange of ideas.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of an initial requirement to prove the matrix is orthogonal before finding its inverse, which may influence the approach taken. The original poster's confusion about the matrix's properties has been addressed, but the exact implications of these properties remain under discussion.

ehilge
Messages
160
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I need to find the inverse of the following matrix:
[(cos*sin) (-cos) (sin2)]
[(cos2) (sin) (-cos*sin)]
[(sin) 0 (cos)]


Homework Equations


gauss-jordan elimination


The Attempt at a Solution


I know that in general, gauss-jordan elimination can be used to solve the inverse of a 3x3, but given this matrix, I don't see how that method could be particularly useful or efficient. I tried to get started using gauss-jordan but expressions quickly became to large to deal with. Are there any slightly less involved ways to find the inverse here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It might ease the pain to make substitutions a = sin, b = cos, then substitute back when you are done. I'm guessing (w/o actually solving it) that some of the terms will simplify in the end.
 
ok, crisis averted. it probably would have been helpful to note that the first part of the problem was to prove that the matrix is orthogonal, and then find the inverse. What I didn't realize was that for an orthogonal matrix A-1=AT which makes the problem much easier

thanks for you help anyway
 
ehilge said:
ok, crisis averted.
You sure about that? The matrix presented in the original post is *not* an orthogonal matrix. This is:

\bmatrix<br /> \cos x \sin x &amp; -\cos x &amp; \sin^2x \\ \cos^2x &amp;\sin x &amp; \cos x \sin x \\ \sin x &amp; 0 &amp; -\cos x<br /> \endbmatrix

Did you mean that instead (or something like it)?
 
D H said:
Did you mean that instead (or something like it)?

yes, as a matter of fact I did mean something like that. The upper right hand term in the original matrix should be -sin2(x), not just sin2(x). Thanks for catching that.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K