Can humans really see in the infrared spectrum?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter bobie
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the question of human visibility in the infrared spectrum, specifically addressing the lowest visible frequency and the longest wavelength that individuals can perceive. Participants explore the sensitivity of the human eye to different wavelengths, the variation among individuals, and the implications of these factors in practical scenarios.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants mention that the longest wavelength most people can see is around 780 nm, which corresponds to approximately 385 THz.
  • Others note that individual sensitivity to longer wavelengths can vary significantly, with some individuals potentially unable to see any red light at all.
  • A participant suggests that the ability to see wavelengths beyond 780 nm may depend on specific chemical compositions in the eye.
  • There is a discussion about the challenges of distinguishing reliable sources of information online and the importance of researching thoroughly before asking questions.
  • Some participants propose practical experiments, such as creating a rainbow with a prism, to explore the properties of visible light.
  • Concerns are raised about the safety of using lasers and the potential for eye damage from wavelengths that are not visible.
  • Links to various resources are shared for further exploration of the spectral sensitivity of the human eye and related topics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the approximate limits of human visibility in the spectrum but express differing views on individual variations and the potential for seeing in the infrared. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the specifics of individual capabilities and the implications of these variations.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the dependence of visibility on individual biological factors and the chemistry of the eye, suggesting that there may be sharp cut-off wavelengths influenced by these factors. The discussion also reflects a range of opinions on the reliability of online resources and the challenges of conducting independent research.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to students and individuals curious about human vision, the properties of light, and the scientific method in exploring sensory perception.

bobie
Gold Member
Messages
720
Reaction score
2
Hi,
what is the lowest visible frequency? can anyone see light with f less than 4*1014 Hz?
 
Science news on Phys.org
This is a very commonly asked question - did you try canvassing the answers?

The longest wavelength most people have a chance of seeing is 780nm ... with differences between individuals.
Which is around 3.85x1014Hz or 385THz

That wavelength is incredibly difficult to see - try it.
Frequencies "less than" that get easier to see ... but I think you meant to ask about higher frequencies :)

AFAIK: nobody is tracking World records for the longest wavelength of light seen.
What do you want to know for?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Simon Bridge said:
This is a very commonly asked question - did you try canvassing the answers?

The longest wavelength most people have a chance of seeing is 780nm ... with differences between individuals.

What do you want to know for?
Thanks, just out of interest, actually the bolded part is what interested me most. I must learn to "canvass", I regret I did not know that :redface: , and got a yellow card!
Thanks again
 
Googling your question is a good tool, and good training for when you have to do literature reviews.
Read lots of replies to get a feel for the range of answers to expect - and use this information to refine your question for the next round of searching. That way, by the time you ask a question here, it will be a very well thought out and researched question. i.e. you could have asked about the variation in long wavelength sensitivity between individuals right off the bat.

To get the variation between individuals, you want to find some actual data ... that would be "spectral sensitivity of the human eye". This is a field with lots of work being done for different reasons but hunting in, say, Google Scholar, will give you an idea of how big-a question you asked :)

The cut-off wavelengths will probably be quite sharp since they depend on the chemistry of the cones in the retina. 780nm would be "near infra-red" BTW. Longer than that and the light starts to get detected by your body as heat.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Simon Bridge said:
That wavelength is incredibly difficult to see - try it.
Is there really a chance I could do that?, I'd love to
Simon Bridge said:
Googling your question is a good tool
Read lots of replies.
I am only a student and probably do not belong here.
I tried googling but it is dangerous for me as I cannot distinguish good sites from bad :
I found a site on QM that explained things very clearly, I asked in a (probably my first) thread if it was reliable (how could I know?) : the thread was deleted and I was reprimanded as the answer, apparently, was "no"

In this case I tried at a good site a mentor recommended:
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/hframe.html
and it gives ( like wiki and other sites) a figure of 700 nm, which I suspected to be a rounded figure. You confirmed that, but I could not possibly expect such a different figure of 790 , the one you gave me
And then, I was curious to know if that can vary a lot with individuals.

This is only in order to justify my behaviour. Please accept my apologies for wasting your time:smile:
 
bobie, You are NOT wasting member's time here. You've asked quite reasonable questions. You've already advanced your research skills by taking the good advice given by Simon Bridge above.

In addition to searching the literature you may consider experimenting.
Can you make a rainbow at home?
Do you have a prism?
Can you place it in the sun and display the rainbow on a sheet of white paper?
How do scientists measure the wavelengths (or frequencies) of visible light?
Can you imagine an experiment where you invite your friends to look at various "colors" and record the results?
Can you apply the scientific method?

That Hyperphysics link is excellent. It will show you accurate and correct physics. Trust that site!

Keep us informed on your progress, and feel free to ask anytime if you have some questions or doubts. Members here at Physics Forums are always ready and willing to assist anyone who is a true "searcher".

Cheers, Bobbywhy
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
You can buy 780 nm laser diodes. Be very careful because light you can't see can still blind you.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
bobie said:
Is there really a chance I could do that?, I'd love to
780nm diodes are not inexpensive ... take care though.
You can also construct a simple spectrograph from a diffraction grating... you'll get a rainbow off white light. You can mark off the extreme ends of the color band and use some geometry to work out what the wavelengths were.

The main trouble is that the long-wavelength response of you eye is not great so you need qute a bright light to see it and that can be dangerous.

I am only a student and probably do not belong here.
Nonsense. This site exists to help students struggling with this sort of material.
Don't let the terseness of replies get to you - if I thought you didn't belong here I would not have replied at all.

I tried googling but it is dangerous for me as I cannot distinguish good sites from bad :
I found a site on QM that explained things very clearly, I asked in a (probably my first) thread if it was reliable (how could I know?) : the thread was deleted and I was reprimanded as the answer, apparently, was "no"
That is why you look at lots of answers - yu soon learn which sites are reliable.
You can also get good info off unreliable sites too ... which is a bit unforntunate.

In this case I tried at a good site a mentor recommended:
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/hframe.html
and it gives ( like wiki and other sites) a figure of 700 nm, which I suspected to be a rounded figure. You confirmed that, but I could not possibly expect such a different figure of 790 , the one you gave me
hyperphysics is an educational site so it gives the standard limits ... more detailed information usually requires more detailed background knowledge.

And then, I was curious to know if that can vary a lot with individuals.
Variation between individuals can be dramatic - with some people unable to see any red light at all.
But do not expect a great deal of penetration into the infrared ... the ability depends on chemistry and hard physical laws. For someone to see 790nm, they'd probably have to have an extra chemical in their eyes no-one else has.

detailed rundown on the human visual system...
http://micro.magnet.fsu.edu/primer/lightandcolor/humanvisionintro.html
... scroll down to "absorption spectra of human visual pigments"

http://www.phys.ufl.edu/~hagen/phz4710/readings/AJPSofferLynch.pdf
... discusses evolutionary constraints on what the eye is susceptable to

But what you want is something that covers "photometric properties"
http://www.ecse.rpi.edu/~schubert/Light-Emitting-Diodes-dot-org/Sample-Chapter.pdf

... what you are looking for is
"spectral responce of the human eye" or "near-infrared response of the human eye".
https://www.physicsforums.com/newreply.php?do=newreply&p=4542447

If you are looking into specific claims of being able to see in the infrared there may be more direct approaches to checking them out.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K