Can I Push the Moon Instantly?

  • Thread starter Thread starter darrin016
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Moon Push
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the feasibility of pushing the Moon using a hypothetical stick that defies physics. It explores the idea that while one end of the stick could be pushed, the movement of the other end cannot exceed the speed of light, as the impulse travels at the speed of sound within the stick. The analogy of a laser pointer is used to illustrate that while the dot can appear to move faster than light, it does not transmit information at that speed. Ultimately, the consensus is that any physical push or impulse cannot exceed the speed of light, maintaining the principles of physics. The conversation highlights the distinction between perceived motion and actual information transfer in physics.
darrin016
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Can a push, be faster than light?
If I was to hold a stick that stretched out to the moon, and pushed it. Could I push the moon instantly?
Seeing as that the stick could defy physics etc and I had enough strength to make an impact on the moon.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I feel like it's possible. I push one end, the other end needs to move to make room for the stick pushing right?
 
Even though the 'poke' is 'travelling' faster than light, as long as the stick is traveling slower than light, you're okay. If you had a million billion trillion km long stick that you pushed 1mm in 1/100th of a second, nothing would actually be going faster than light. The same idea applies with a laser pointer on the moon. If you flick the dot back and forth really fast on earth, the dot appears to move faster than light.
 
But the push would have to react instantly. How can one end of the stick move, while the end doesn't?
Has to be faster than light
 
See https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=536289
 
Last edited by a moderator:
97313 said:
Even though the 'poke' is 'travelling' faster than light,
It is not. The impulse is traveling at the speed of sound within the rod, which is slower than light. The impulse carries information so it cannot travel faster than light.

97313 said:
The same idea applies with a laser pointer on the moon.
No, it is completely different.

97313 said:
If you flick the dot back and forth really fast on earth, the dot appears to move faster than light.
It doesn't just appear, it is moving faster than light. But the dot carries no information across the surface, so it can move at any speed.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top