Can I Solve Complex Numbers in Polar Form Like Regular Equations?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around solving equations involving complex numbers in polar form, specifically whether the methods used are analogous to solving regular algebraic equations. Participants explore the calculation of a specific equation and the validity of their approaches.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested, Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents an equation involving complex numbers in polar form and attempts to solve for I2, questioning if the method is similar to regular math.
  • Another participant seeks clarification on the term I2 and suggests a more traditional notation for the equation.
  • Some participants assert that I2 is being multiplied and express uncertainty about the correctness of the solution, particularly regarding the treatment of the left-hand side (LHS) and right-hand side (RHS) of the equation.
  • There is a suggestion that to add terms in polar form, one should convert to rectangular form and then perform the addition.
  • Participants discuss the use of a calculator for performing calculations in polar form, with one participant expressing a desire to understand the process manually.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the correctness of the method used to solve for I2, with some questioning the approach and others defending it. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the proper method for adding terms in polar form and the validity of the calculations presented.

Contextual Notes

There are mentions of converting between polar and rectangular forms, but the specific steps and assumptions involved in these conversions are not fully detailed. The discussion also reflects varying levels of familiarity with the terminology and methods used in complex number calculations.

noname1
Messages
131
Reaction score
0
I got this equation

5<0° = -14.14<-45° + 2.24<116.6° I2

And i solved I2 this way

I2 = -14.14<-45° / 2.24<116.6°

I2 = 8<150.29°

I want to know complex numbers is the same way as normal math or not

thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
noname1 said:
I got this equation

5<0° = -14.14<-45° + 2.24<116.6° I2

And i solved I2 this way

I2 = -14.14<-45° / 2.24<116.6°

I2 = 8<150.29°

I want to know complex numbers is the same way as normal math or not

thanks in advance

What is I2? Is it something special, or just a term multiplying the 2nd number on the righthand side (RHS) of the equation?

If the latter, I think it would be more traditional to write it as:

5<0° = -14.14<-45° + I2 * 2.24<116.6°
 
i2 is being multiplied, its a current in the second mesh but i just wanted to be sure if it is that way its calculated
 
noname1 said:
i2 is being multiplied, its a current in the second mesh but i just wanted to be sure if it is that way its calculated

In that case, I don't think you've solved for I2 correctly. For one thing, the LHS term disappeared?

To add the two terms on the RHS, you would convert from polar to rectangular form, and add the x and y components. Then represent the LHS in rectangular components (that part is easy), and solve for I2.
 
berkeman said:
In that case, I don't think you've solved for I2 correctly. For one thing, the LHS term disappeared?

To add the two terms on the RHS, you would convert from polar to rectangular form, and add the x and y components. Then represent the LHS in rectangular components (that part is easy), and solve for I2.


what do you mean by lhs and rhs? i am kind of lost
 
noname1 said:
what do you mean by lhs and rhs? i am kind of lost

I defined the term RHS in my post #2.
 
berkeman said:
I defined the term RHS in my post #2.

this is what i did, i put i2 term on left side and than the rest on the rhs and since i want I2 i divided both equations by 2.24<116.6°

5<0° = -14.14<-45° + I2 * 2.24<116.6°

5<0° + 14.14<-45° = I2 * 2.24<116.6°

(5<0° + 14.14<-45°) / 2.24<116.6° = I2

I2 = 8<150.29°
 
noname1 said:
this is what i did, i put i2 term on left side and than the rest on the rhs and since i want I2 i divided both equations by 2.24<116.6°

5<0° = -14.14<-45° + I2 * 2.24<116.6°

5<0° + 14.14<-45° = I2 * 2.24<116.6°

(5<0° + 14.14<-45°) / 2.24<116.6° = I2

I2 = 8<150.29°

How are you adding terms in polar form?
 
  • #10
berkeman said:
How are you adding terms in polar form?

this part

(5<0° + 14.14<-45°) / 2.24<116.6° = I2

i have my ti-89 calculating it but i just want to know if it is correct if i can calculate polar form like a normal equation

example

3x -5 = 10
3x = 15
x=5
 
  • #11
noname1 said:
this part

(5<0° + 14.14<-45°) / 2.24<116.6° = I2

i have my ti-89 calculating it but i just want to know if it is correct if i can calculate polar form like a normal equation

example

3x -5 = 10
3x = 15
x=5

LOL. Your calculator is doing the conversions for you (hopefully). You might want to double check the answer the good old fashioned way, by hand, just to be sure you understand the process.
 

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
3K