Using NVA to Solve for i in Polar Form | Complex Numbers Homework

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around solving for the current ##i## in a circuit using nodal voltage analysis (NVA) and expressing the answer in polar form. Participants are addressing a homework problem that involves setting up equations based on circuit nodes and applying Kirchhoff's laws.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents their setup of equations based on nodal analysis, expressing current and voltage relationships.
  • Another participant suggests focusing on KCL and using consistent current directions to simplify the analysis.
  • There is a recognition that the initial equations appear correct, but discrepancies in results lead to questions about potential calculation errors.
  • Participants discuss the importance of using the correct notation for imaginary units, with one participant realizing they mistakenly used ##i## instead of ##j## in their calculations.
  • One participant shares their method of solving the equations using matrix algebra, prompting others to compare their approaches.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the structure of the equations but have differing results, indicating unresolved discrepancies in their calculations. There is no consensus on the correct values for the node voltages or the current.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the use of radians versus degrees, which may affect their calculations. The discussion also highlights the potential for errors in interpreting variables and notation.

Drakkith
Mentor
Messages
23,205
Reaction score
7,687

Homework Statement


Use NVA to solve for ##i##.
Enter your answer in polar form with the angle in degrees.
NVA Problem.jpg

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



My nodes are as follows: ##V_1## on the left middle junction, ##V_2## is the junction in the very center, and ##V_3## is the junction on the middle right, just above the capacitor.

I set up ##V_2## and ##V_3## as a supernode and found 3 equations:
##i=\frac{V_1-V_2}{16}##
##16i=V_1-V_2##
##V_2+16i=V_1##

##1). V_2+0V_3+16i=2∠0°##

Supernode:
##-i+\frac{V_2}{16}-\frac{i}{8}+\frac{V_3}{-8j}=0##
##-16i+V_2-2i-\frac{2V_3}{j}=0##

##2.) V_2-\frac{2V_3}{j}-18i=0##

Across the source in the supernode:
##V_3-V_2 = 4∠45°##

##3.) -V_2+V_3+0i=4∠45°##

That's 3 equations and 3 unknowns. Solving for ##i## gives me ##0.486∠-20.45°##, which isn't correct.
 

Attachments

  • NVA Problem.jpg
    NVA Problem.jpg
    7.3 KB · Views: 891
Physics news on Phys.org
To use NVA (also known as nodal analysis) you want to express everything as a bunch of KCLs.

Your equations are using voltage, which is complicating things (KVLs). I personally find it easier to do all current going out or current going in. mixing the two can get confusing.

There are two unknown voltages, v2 and v3. v1 is just 2 volts.

You need one equation (KCL) at your super-node, with the Currents going out (or in)
One equation relating V2 and V3 (you already have that)
One equation relating V2 and i (you already mentioned V2+16i=V1)
 
Last edited:
Ahhh i see what you did, you initially did nodal analysis, but then converted the equations the a solvable format.
disregard my previous post.

Your equations look correct. I got different answers wiht the same equations, it is possible you made a mistake with solving your equations?
 
donpacino said:
Your equations look correct. I got different answers wiht the same equations, it is possible you made a mistake with solving your equations?

It's always possible, but I've put these numbers into my calculator to solve at least a dozen times and I can't find where I might have gone wrong (and it hasn't failed to correctly solve a problem yet. At least when I've entered everything in correctly).
 
What are you getting for your node voltages?
are you using radians instead of degrees (or vice versa)
 
donpacino said:
What are you getting for your node voltages?
are you using radians instead of degrees (or vice versa)
I'm getting:
##V_2=7.317∠-95.6°##
##V_3=4.929∠-64.61°##
I'm in degrees like the problem tells me to be in.
 
ok, that's different than I am getting, are you solving it using a matrix?

the way I solved it, I used X=A^-1 * B

from our system of equations
A= [ 1 0 16 ; 1 0+2j -18 ; -1 1 0 ]

B = [2 0 2.82+2.82j]

Do you have anything different?
 
I figured it out. I was putting ##16i## instead of ##16## into my calculator for the 1st equation, thinking that ##i## was the imaginary unit instead of ##j##. :mad:

Thanks for your help, donpacino. I don't think I would have seen that had you not had +16 in your matrix.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: donpacino
Drakkith said:
I figured it out. I was putting ##16i## instead of ##16## into my calculator for the 1st equation, thinking that ##i## was the imaginary unit instead of ##j##. :mad:

Thanks for your help, donpacino. I don't think I would have seen that had you not had +16 in your matrix.
no Problem. happens to the best of us!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
13K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
24K