Can I Use a DIY Hydrogen Alpha Solar Filter for Detailed Sun Photography?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility of using a DIY Hydrogen Alpha (Ha) solar filter for detailed solar photography, specifically in comparison to purchasing a dedicated Coronado telescope. Participants explore the technical requirements for effective solar imaging and share personal experiences and recommendations regarding solar filters and telescopes.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express skepticism about the effectiveness of a DIY Hydrogen Alpha filter, noting that high-quality filters with narrow bandwidths (less than 1nm) are necessary for capturing solar prominences and surface features.
  • One participant mentions the significant cost of professional filters, suggesting that a Coronado telescope may offer better results for solar photography.
  • Another participant shares their experience with a Lunt solar filter, indicating satisfaction with its performance and suggesting it as a viable option.
  • Concerns are raised about the practicality of using a single telescope for both solar and nighttime observations, with some advocating for separate setups to avoid complications.
  • There is a discussion about the bandwidth of Ha filters, with one participant emphasizing that a standard astro Ha filter with a bandwidth of ~7nm would be inadequate for solar imaging.
  • Some participants indicate a need to budget for higher-quality solar filters or telescopes, reflecting on the balance between cost and performance.
  • One participant expresses uncertainty about the urgency of purchasing new equipment due to low sunspot activity, suggesting a more measured approach to decision-making.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best approach for solar photography. There are multiple competing views regarding the effectiveness of DIY solutions versus professional equipment, as well as differing opinions on the necessity of separate telescopes for solar and nighttime use.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the importance of bandwidth in Ha filters and the potential limitations of using a glass solar filter in conjunction with other filters. There are unresolved questions about the specific requirements for effective solar imaging and the practicality of different setups.

Remedyworld
Messages
5
Reaction score
8
TL;DR
DIY Hydrogen Alpha Solar Filter
I'm interested in doing more detailed photos of the Sun using my solar filter and a 1.25" Hydrogen Alpha (Ha) filter. Is this possible to do or is it best to purchase a Coronado telescope?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Remedyworld said:
Summary:: DIY Hydrogen Alpha Solar Filter

I'm interested in doing more detailed photos of the Sun using my solar filter and a 1.25" Hydrogen Alpha (Ha) filter. Is this possible to do or is it best to purchase a Coronado telescope?
Oh I wish . . . . . .
Your Hα filter will be great for looking at nebulae etc. To get good images of Hα in the presence of all that wideband Solar radiation, you need a filter (bandpass) of only a few nm. You need an Etalon filter which will cost you a minimum of £1k. (Also a pukka filter to reduce the illuminance to something safe for you and your image sensor)
Now and then I try to search for a DIY version and I realize that you will need a pretty good Optical Lab production facility and some pretty good quality glass. Shame!
The images I have seen in a Coronado are pretty impressive, considering the reasonable entry level cost but I ask myself if I bought one, how long would I be satisfied. Also, (if you don't already have one) you would need a good mount so that you can take images to reduce the atmospheric distortions etc. etc. So would it not be worth while starting off a level or two above the Coronado? Get thee behind me Satan! The kids need new shoes and food on the table. :confused:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Remedyworld
hmmm, thanks for the info. Look like I need to budget for a Lundt :)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
Remedyworld said:
hmmm, thanks for the info. Look like I need to budget for a Lundt :)
If you will use it enough, I cannot think you'll regret it.
 
Absolutely will use it a lot. Most of my solar photos are of sunspots, but solar proms are the next step. Just thought I could speed up the process a bit.
 
Remedyworld said:
hmmm, thanks for the info. Look like I need to budget for a Lundt :)

I can recommend the LUNT ( there is no "D") I have the 60mm THa model for a couple of years now.
There is a thread in the astronomy section on my solar observations

Remedyworld said:
1.25" Hydrogen Alpha (Ha) filter.

You didnt say what bandwidth you Ha filter is ? if it is just a normal astro Ha filter, then it's
bandwidth at ~ 7nm will be just way too wide. Bandwidths of less than 1nm are needed to see
prominences, filaments and other surface features. my one tunes between 0.5 and 0.7 nm

cheers
Dave
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sophiecentaur
davenn said:
I can recommend the LUNT ( there is no "D") I have the 60mm THa model for a couple of years now.
Is there a good reason for having a different OTA for solar and for nighttime? I have an 80mm Skywatcher Equinox and could buy a solar wedge which could be followed by any appropriate filter. Total cost could be less (?) than a Lunt for a given performance.
 
I actually don't have an Ha filter yet. I have a glass solar filter I use for my observations and was thinking I can combine with an Ha filter.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
davenn said:
I can recommend the LUNT ( there is no "D") I have the 60mm THa model for a couple of years now.
There is a thread in the astronomy section on my solar observations
You didnt say what bandwidth you Ha filter is ? if it is just a normal astro Ha filter, then it's
bandwidth at ~ 7nm will be just way too wide. Bandwidths of less than 1nm are needed to see
prominences, filaments and other surface features. my one tunes between 0.5 and 0.7 nm

cheers
Dave
Also thank for the feedback Dave. I'm searching for 2 Ha filters one between 0.5 and 0.7 nm (solar viewing) and one for deep sky objects.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
  • #10
sophiecentaur said:
Is there a good reason for having a different OTA for solar and for nighttime?

yup, sheer ease of use. you would have to dismantle the full back end of a solar scope so that
you could remove the etalon etc and then install a suitable focusser etc for your night time use
I couldn't think of too many things more annoying and time consuming than having to do that
swap over all the time, not to mention the probability of getting dust into the OTA and other bits

sophiecentaur said:
I have an 80mm Skywatcher Equinox and could buy a solar wedge which could be followed by any appropriate filter.

Then just get a Daystar Quark either the Prominence one (0.5-0.7nm) like I got for my 120mm Skywatcher
refractor or the Chromosphere one ( ~0.4 - 0.6nm)

https://www.daystarfilters.com/Quark.shtmlDave
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sophiecentaur
  • #11
Remedyworld said:
I actually don't have an Ha filter yet. I have a glass solar filter I use for my observations and was thinking I can combine with an Ha filter.

No, that isn't a plan. You cannot put a normal white light glass filter on a scope followed by a solar filter
it won't enough light through.

Either buy a Coronado, a Lunt or a Daystar system :smile:Dave
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sophiecentaur
  • #12
davenn said:
you could remove the etalon etc and then install a suitable focusser etc for your night time use
I don't have a permanent setup (apart from my heavy mount) so everything has to be re-assembled before any activities. I can see how an 'observatory lifestyle' makes things different for people.

I am clearly going to have to read around more and more before I make any decisions. I have to say the low level of sunspot activity at the moment makes it all feel less urgent and I am not gagging for new equipment. That will allow me to be more sensible about it all.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 226 ·
8
Replies
226
Views
17K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 311 ·
11
Replies
311
Views
55K
  • · Replies 93 ·
4
Replies
93
Views
13K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
9K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K