Can ITER and Molten Salt Thorium Reactors Revolutionize Fusion Power?

AI Thread Summary
The ITER fusion tokomak project is highlighted as a transformative initiative that could revolutionize energy production if successful. Molten salt thorium reactors are also being revisited, potentially utilizing nuclear waste for safer, non-pressurized designs. Fusion, particularly involving deuterium and tritium, presents significant technical challenges, requiring effective confinement of particles through electric and magnetic fields to increase collision frequency and enhance fusion reactions. Achieving ignition is crucial, where the energy from fusion reactions sustains further collisions, leading to continuous energy generation. The discussion underscores the complex interplay of physics and engineering necessary for advancing both fusion and fission technologies.
yaakov
I would suggest that everyone check out the ITER fusion tokomak project in progress. If this unit works it will change the world. Also Molten salt thorium reactors have gotten a fresh look..Weinberg and Radkowsky s work from the old days may use nuclear waste blend to power no pressurized safer reactor design.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Thorium being fission vs ITER fusion sorry.
 
Fusion is the arguably most difficult technical, engineering, and theoretical challenge of the twenty first century. By releasing, in an exothermic reaction, the nuclear binding energy and transferring what is theoretically known as mass defect energy into thermal energy, power can be generated. Controlled fusion is a reaction of deuterium, tritium and helium. When these particles are injected into a vessel, say a torus, the 3/2 kT kinetic energy of an ideal gas basically means that each particle has a a momenta and an energy. By confining particles with electric and magnetic fields, the mean free path of particles decreases, intuitively. This means the collision frequency increases. More collisions mean more fusion. Better confining fields means more fusion. Particles follow geodesics on the principle of least action. The energy of the fusion particles is mu dot B for the magnetic energy and 1/2 m r dot squared, or the kinetic energy. If optical tweezer like lasers or quadrupole electric focusing fields are added, the particles feel an additional force of q times E. Gradients in E and B can perturb orbits. Since F dot dL is work, we can add some electric energy term to the Lagrangian. I think it is the electric dipole or induced dipole times E. After we find geodesics in our toroidal shape, we then calculate the number of particle collisions in an atomic dynamics simulation. From this equation, we find eigenmodes, loss orbits, and fusion collisions. What we need is ignition, or a process where helium has sufficient energy after the deuterium tritium collision so that it can impart enough momentum into a fusion reactant to drive a new fusion collision so the process can repeat forever - or at least until we run out of deuterium. Then neutrons are released, photons are released, and some helium ash and possible Be and Li appear. We used a heat exchanger to get usable electricity in thermoelectric conversion.
 
Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information(power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.) for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...
Hi everyone, I'm a complete beginner with MCNP and trying to learn how to perform burnup calculations. Right now, I'm feeling a bit lost and not sure where to start. I found the OECD-NEA Burnup Credit Calculational Criticality Benchmark (Phase I-B) and was wondering if anyone has worked through this specific benchmark using MCNP6? If so, would you be willing to share your MCNP input file for it? Seeing an actual working example would be incredibly helpful for my learning. I'd be really...

Similar threads

Replies
30
Views
4K
Replies
70
Views
10K
Replies
32
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Poll Poll
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
7K
Back
Top