Can Lasers Produce Matter Through 'Collisions'?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the potential for laser beams to collide and produce matter, similar to how particles can generate energy and other particles through collisions. It highlights that photons can indeed collide to create matter-antimatter pairs, a phenomenon known as "pair production," which occurred shortly after the Big Bang. However, achieving the necessary high density of photons for such collisions remains a challenge. The conversation also touches on the theoretical implications of intersecting lasers potentially forming a black hole due to high energy density. Overall, while the concept is intriguing, experimental evidence and practical feasibility are still under exploration.
char20
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
We all know about particles colliding and producing various other particles plus energy i.e. EM radiation, but is the reverse possible? Is it be possible for laser beams to 'collide' and produce matter? Has this been done experimentally or is there a theoretical reason that it cannot happen?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Photons (not necessarily laser beams) can collide and produce matter-antimatter pairs. This happened right after the big bang. In order for this to occur, a very high density of photons is needed to get collisions.
 
char20 said:
We all know about particles colliding and producing various other particles plus energy i.e. EM radiation, but is the reverse possible? Is it be possible for laser beams to 'collide' and produce matter? Has this been done experimentally or is there a theoretical reason that it cannot happen?

Look up "pair production".

Zz.
 
Here's something very similar http://www.cosmosmagazine.com/news/2345/laser-creates-billions-particles-antimatter
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Light can be a source of gravitation so if 2 or more lasers of sufficient intensity intersect and form a region with sufficient energy density to form a black hole then they would be unable to continue on past the region of intersection. I suppose a black hole should be considered "matter" regardless of what is inside the event horizon since that is undefinable anyway.
 
I would like to use a pentaprism with some amount of magnification. The pentaprism will be used to reflect a real image at 90 degrees angle but I also want the reflected image to appear larger. The distance between the prism and the real image is about 70cm. The pentaprism has two reflecting sides (surfaces) with mirrored coating and two refracting sides. I understand that one of the four sides needs to be curved (spherical curvature) to achieve the magnification effect. But which of the...
Back
Top