Can light generate propulsion?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter RandyD123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light Propulsion
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of light generating propulsion, particularly in the context of using flashlights or lasers in space. Participants explore theoretical implications, practical applications, and comparisons with traditional propulsion methods.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that light has momentum and can generate thrust, referencing concepts like solar sails.
  • There is a suggestion that a flashlight in space could move slightly when turned on, although the force is described as extremely small.
  • One participant highlights the advantage of light propulsion in that it does not require the craft to carry fuel, as it can use a fixed power source to illuminate a solar sail.
  • Another participant points out that using an onboard light source imparts momentum without depleting the craft's mass, contrasting it with traditional rocket engines.
  • However, a counterpoint is raised that shining light does deplete mass due to the energy having a mass equivalent.
  • Participants discuss the implications of photon momentum and the relationship between ejected mass and thrust, noting that the effective mass defect is tiny.
  • There is mention of a trade-off regarding thrust per unit energy, with a discussion on the sweet spot for exhaust velocity depending on fuel energy density.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of light propulsion, particularly regarding mass depletion and the efficiency of thrust generation. The discussion remains unresolved with competing perspectives on the mechanics involved.

Contextual Notes

Some claims depend on specific assumptions about energy density and the mechanics of photon momentum, which are not fully explored or resolved in the discussion.

Science news on Phys.org
So if I had a flashlight in space and I turned it on, I could see it moving relative to me?
 
RandyD123 said:
So if I had a flashlight in space and I turned it on, I could see it moving relative to me?
Yes, if you are in free fall and you turn on a flashlight and then let go of it, it will accelerate slightly. However, the operative word here is "slightly", as the force involved is extremely small - it's a good exercise to try calculating it for yourself, but for reasonable assumptions about the size and power of a flashlight I'm getting a micro-Newton or thereabouts, which is well and thoroughly negligible.

The real appeal of light propulsion is that you can use a fixed power source to illuminate a solar sail, so the propulsion system doesn't have to accelerate itself and its fuel supply. You attach the sail to the payload, and then send it on its way using a powerful earth-based laser.
 
. . . or light from a nearby star.
 
Another advantage of light propulsion is that, if you use an on-board torch (X1000000, say), you are imparting momentum to your craft without using up any of its mass which is what always happens with a rocket engine. Even Ion Drive engines end up depleting their mass.
 
sophiecentaur said:
Another advantage of light propulsion is that, if you use an on-board torch (X1000000, say), you are imparting momentum to your craft without using up any of its mass which is what always happens with a rocket engine. Even Ion Drive engines end up depleting their mass.
Ummm, shining a light out the back does deplete mass. The required energy has a mass equivalent.
 
jbriggs444 said:
Ummm, shining a light out the back does deplete mass. The required energy has a mass equivalent.
True, in principle but there is a factor of c2 in there somewhere. Not sure where the photon momentum (hc/λ) would affect the effective ratio of ejected mass and ejected photons but the mass defect would still be tiny.
 
  • #10
sophiecentaur said:
True, in principle but there is a factor of c2 in there somewhere. Not sure where the photon momentum (hc/λ) would affect the effective ratio of ejected mass and ejected photons but the mass defect would still be tiny.
Yes, but there is a trade-off. The thrust per unit energy is also tiny.

The sweet spot for exhaust velocity depends on the energy density of your fuel. A photon drive is in the sweet spot for an antimatter fuel source. With less energy density than that, a lower exhaust velocity is better -- eject the expended fuel as reaction mass.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: houlahound and sophiecentaur

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
8K