Can Magnetic Traps Achieve Bose-Einstein Condensate?

AI Thread Summary
Magnetic traps operate by creating a gradient in the magnetic field that interacts with the magnetic moments of atoms, allowing for the trapping of low-field seekers. These traps can achieve Bose-Einstein Condensate (BEC) under specific conditions, as demonstrated in a 1995 study where 87Rb atoms formed a condensate at 170 nK with a density of 2.5 x 10^12 cm^-3, maintained for 15 seconds with around 2,000 atoms. The discussion raises the question of whether it is feasible to create a BEC with larger quantities, such as 5 grams of atoms, but highlights the challenge of significant atom loss during evaporative cooling. Current limitations in scaling up the number of atoms while maintaining a stable condensate remain a key concern. Overall, while magnetic traps can achieve BEC, scaling to larger quantities presents substantial difficulties.
Kalrag
Messages
104
Reaction score
0
Lately I've been wondering how magnetic traps work. So can anyone tell me how they work, How long they can hold atoms and if they can achieave Bose-Einstein Condensate? Also I have been wondering if they could hold several grams of atoms and then create the Bose-Einstein Effect. Can anyone help me?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Magnetic traps work by essentially creating a gradient in the magnetic field. As you may know, atoms possesses a magnetic moment. This is why they have a potential energy:

<br /> U = -\mathbf{\mu} \cdot \mathbf{B}<br />

The negative gradient of this potential energy determines the force:

<br /> \mathbf{F} = -\nabla U = \nabla(\mathbf{\mu} \cdot \mathbf{B}) = \nabla(\mathbf{\mu} \cdot \stackrel{\downarrow}{\mathbf{B}})<br />

In the adiabatic approximation, we neglect the possible precession of the magnetic moment of the atoms and assume that they are always aligned along the magnetic field line, i.e.

<br /> \mathbf{\mu} = \mu \, \hat{\mathbf{b}}<br />

However, using:

<br /> \nabla B = \nabla (B^{2})^{\frac{1}{2}} = \nabla (\mathbf{B} \cdot \mathbf{B})^{\frac{1}{2}} = \frac{1}{2} \, (\mathbf{B} \cdot \mathbf{B})^{-\frac{1}{2}} \nabla (\mathbf{B} \cdot \mathbf{B}) = \frac{1}{B} \nabla (\mathbf{B} \cdot \stackrel{\downarrow}{\mathbf{B}}) = \nabla(\hat{\mathbf{b}} \cdot \stackrel{\downarrow}{\mathbf{B}})<br />

we may write the force as:

<br /> \mathbf{F} = \mu \nabla B<br />

If \mu &gt; 0, then this force is in the same direction as the gradient of the intensity of the magnetic field. This means it is directed in the direction where the intensity increases. Such atoms are called high-field seekers. On the contrary, atoms with \mu &lt; 0 are called low field seekers. This means that atoms can have stable equilibrium in points where the intensity of the magnetic field is maximal or minimal.

There is a theorem in Classical Electrodynamics that states that the magnetic field cannot have a local maximum in intensity in a space with no currents present. Thus, high-field seekers cannot be trapped.

For low-field seekers, we can produce a local minimum if we create a point where \mathbf{B} = \mathbf{0}. This may be achieved by using two anti-Helmholtz coils (the currents are directed in opposite directions, so that the fields cancel in the region between the two). This kind of field configuration is known as a quadrupole magnetic field. Near the point where the field vanishes (assuming axial symmetry), the magnetic field is approximately:

<br /> \mathbf{B} = B&#039; \left\langle x, y, -2 z \right\rangle<br />

and the magnitude then becomes:

<br /> B = B&#039; \left(x^{2} + y^{2} + 4 z^{2}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}}<br />

The potential energy is:

<br /> U = \mu \, B&#039; \, \left(x^{2} + y^{2} + 4 z^{2}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}}<br />
 
Thanks. Now that I know how they work, can they create a fair amount of the Bose-Einstein Condensate for a long period of time?
 
One of the pioneering papers on the subject (Science 269, 198 (1995)) reported that a condensate fraction of 87Rb atoms first appeared at 170 nK with a central density 2.5 \times 10^{12} \, \mathrm{cm}^{-3}[/ite x] and they managed to contain it for 15 s. They had about 2,000 atoms in the condensate.
 
Now is it possible to take a gram or more of atoms and then create the Bose-Einstein condensate? I guess what I am trying to say is if you can freeze not just 2 thousand atoms but 5 grams worth of atoms.
 
I don't know what the current record is. The problem is that during evaporative cooling, you lose a large fraction of your initial atoms.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top