Can Matter Escape a Black Hole's Gravitational Pull Beyond the Event Horizon?

AI Thread Summary
Event horizons mark the boundary beyond which light cannot escape a black hole's gravity. Matter, like a hypothetical moon, can escape if its initial velocity exceeds the black hole's escape velocity, but once it crosses the event horizon, it cannot return. The discussion emphasizes that matter is influenced by inertia, which differentiates its behavior from that of light. There is only one event horizon, and beyond it, escape is impossible, except through mechanisms like Hawking radiation. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for grasping the nature of black holes and their gravitational effects.
ABHoT
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
I am believing that event horizons refer to where light can no longer escape the gravity of a black hole. What about everything else that moves at less than the speed of light?
If a small moon winked into existence at some point further out than the event horizon with momentum that was sending it away from the black hole (if you could believe such a thing), would it get sucked back into the black hole like light? Does matter get sucked in faster than photons of light? Is there a separate 'event horizon'-like distance where matter can either escape or fall back in?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Ah. Just seen the black hole video.
 
ANY object within the EH will be unable to escape from the black hole. Things farther away than the EH may or may not go into the EH depending on initial velocity.
 
ABHoT said:
I am believing that event horizons refer to where light can no longer escape the gravity of a black hole. What about everything else that moves at less than the speed of light?
If a small moon winked into existence at some point further out than the event horizon with momentum that was sending it away from the black hole (if you could believe such a thing), would it get sucked back into the black hole like light? Does matter get sucked in faster than photons of light? Is there a separate 'event horizon'-like distance where matter can either escape or fall back in?

With the moon, it would depend on it's initial velocity, like Matterwave noted, and the strength of the black hole. If the initial velocity is greater than the escape velocity, it's good to go. As for matter and photons, well matter has inertia, so you can naturally make conclusions off of that. There is only one event horizon, & beyond that, as far as we know, there is no hope of getting back out, except Hawking radiation.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top