Can Methane Gas Pass Through Activated Carbon?

AI Thread Summary
Methane gas (CH4) may pass through activated carbon without being trapped, depending on the specific conditions and characteristics of the activated carbon used. The discussion centers on testing the ability of activated carbon to absorb methane from gases produced by compost. There is uncertainty about whether activated carbon effectively captures methane, which is crucial for isolating it for natural gas production. The user seeks guidance on experimental methods to determine methane's behavior in this context. Overall, the effectiveness of activated carbon in trapping methane remains an open question that requires further investigation.
turnerdhr
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I want to know if methane gas (CH4) is able to pass through activated carbon and not get trapped. If it can how does it pass and why does it passes.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Please state your problem with greater detail. How would you propose to test? What do you think?
 
I'm using compost and from it i want to run the gases that are produced by the compost into a colunm that has activated carbon in it, and i can't find anywhere if the activated carbon absorbs the methane or not becasue i want to use the just a methane to get natural gas. I don't think it would trap the methane but I'm not sure.
 
thanks a lot its very helpful and thank you for your time.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top