Can activated carbon be used to create a high voltage DC electroscope?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility of using activated carbon to create a high voltage DC electroscope. Participants explore various methods for generating high voltage, the properties of activated carbon, and the design of circuits that could utilize this setup. The conversation includes theoretical and practical considerations, as well as safety concerns related to high voltage applications.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests using a Wimshurst Machine or a Van de Graaff generator to generate high voltage DC electricity, noting the potential dangers of high voltage.
  • Another participant questions the size of the electroscope and mentions a giant Van de Graaff generator as a possible solution.
  • A participant describes their intention to energize 10 grams of activated carbon to create a high static potential and discusses the surface area implications for charge storage.
  • Concerns are raised about the effectiveness of activated carbon in storing charge due to its surface characteristics, particularly regarding sharp points that may lead to discharge.
  • One participant expresses skepticism about the ability of activated carbon to effectively distribute charge throughout its volume when placed in a dielectric container.
  • Another participant compares the proposed device to modern supercapacitors, discussing the implications of merging layers into a single block and the potential for increased discharge voltage.
  • Questions are posed regarding the conductivity of the liquid used in the dielectric container and its ability to store electrons on the surface of the activated carbon.
  • Concerns are raised about the limitations of charge distribution in activated carbon when insulated and the necessity of a conductive medium to achieve significant capacitance.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the effectiveness of activated carbon for this application, with some supporting its use while others raise doubts about its charge storage capabilities and the design of the proposed circuit. The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple competing perspectives on the feasibility and design considerations.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight various assumptions regarding the properties of activated carbon, the design of the circuit, and the safety implications of high voltage applications. There is an acknowledgment of the complexity involved in achieving the desired electrical characteristics.

taylaron
Gold Member
Messages
391
Reaction score
1
Happy holidays everyone!

I'm searching how to produce high voltage, high current DC electricity to be used for statically charging a giant electroscope. The explanation why is very elaborate, so to put it simply, I need to energize a giant electroscope.

I have limited electrical engineering education, but a thorough explanation would be appreciated.

Perhaps using a Telsa coil to generate high voltage AC current and then rectify the current. Evidently this is not an option because rectifying circuits can not handle such extreme voltages.

Any Ideas?

Regards,
-Tay
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Probably a Wimshurst Machine would be OK. These generate a good spark and it is DC at about 50000 volts. You have to wind a handle to get the voltage.

The next step up would be a Van Der Graaf machine, but that may be too high a voltage for your project. Good ones generate sparks that are a foot long, or more.

Another choice, at your own risk, is a defunct color TV set which has a source of 30000 volts DC in it. If this part of the circuit was still working, that would be plenty for an electroscope.

For you and anyone else reading this, be aware that any voltage over 50 volts can kill you, especially if it is on a capacitor capable of delivering a lot of current.

Don't operate Van Der Graaf machines anywhere near electronic equipment.
 
How giant is that electroscope?
There is a giant Van de Graaff generator that should be perfect for charging giant things.
http://www.mos.org/sln/toe/
However I don't think they will borrow it to you.
 
I'm attempting to energize 10 grams of activated carbon to the highest static potential possible. I will then use the discharge to power a circuit, regulating the flow of electricity with a "current potentiometer" I designed. The surface area is calculated using the activated carbon surface area to weight ratio of 100m^2 per gram [Figure from http://www.cee.vt.edu/ewr/environmental/teach/wtprimer/carbon/sketcarb.html] . Imagine an electroscope with 1,000 m^2 of surface area made of conductive carbon...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
That link doesn't seem to be working, but maybe you could explain why you think this would be a good idea?

One key to getting a high voltage onto something without it discharging is to have a very smooth surface. Charge tends to spark away at any sharp point.
So, you always see Van Der Graaff generators with a highly polished dome on them.

I have to wonder if your conductive carbon would act like a lot of sharp points.

What circuit are you thinking of powering after your "current potentiometer". I'm not even sure what that is, so you could explain that, too, if you like.
 
vk6kro said:
That link doesn't seem to be working
http://www.cee.vt.edu/ewr/environmen...sketcarb.html"
The OP has an extra ] at the end.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
This one works:

http://www.cee.vt.edu/ewr/environmental/teach/wtprimer/carbon/sketcarb.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I apologize for the broken link and yes, http://www.cee.vt.edu/ewr/environmental/teach/wtprimer/carbon/sketcarb.html is the correct link.

The device I'm describing is similar to modern super capacitors according to http://scitizen.com/screens/blogPage/viewBlog/sw_viewBlog.php?idTheme=5&idContribution=174

an appropriate diagram of a modern super capacitor cell can be found here:
http://www.nanomac.uq.edu.au/pdfs/Fact%20SheetSupercapicitors.pdf

Instead of having multiple cells in a super capacitor, I'm attempting to merge the layers into one block and provide a more compact, powerful version. I realize that combining the cells eliminates the possibility of putting multiple cells in series or parallel and thus dramatically increases the discharge voltage (if I am correct).
To prevent premature discharge, the activated carbon would be placed in a very resistive dielectric container.

To best illustrate the device and DC circuit I intend to build, think of two classic gold foil electroscopes, each discharge probe spaced apart from one another. One of the electroscopes is charged with static electricity and the other is neutral. Between the charged scope and the circuit is a "current potentiometer or c-pot". After the c-pot is a resistor and then the resistor is connected to the neutral electroscope. This is illustrated in the image attached. The electrons flow from the high concentration in one electroscope to the other neutral electroscope until both scopes have reached static equilibrium.

I realize that the definition of a circuit is along the lines of 'current traveling in a closed loop' and that the "circuit" described above doesn't exactly describe this definition. But for simplicity sake, I will continue to use the word circuit, although it is the wrong term.

The c-pot I describe works by varying the conductivity of a material. Unfortunately I intend to patent the concept so I can not give much detail.

I am concerned that the electrons stored on the surface area of the activated carbon will not be able to travel freely within the body of activated carbon itself and reach the conductive terminal on one end. Activated carbon supposedly is conductive, but can charge on one side of a clump freely move to the other side? I sure as heck hope so, because modern super capacitors do it on a smaller scale. The increased thickness concerns me.

The dielectric containing the activated carbon would of course be filled with a liquid. Can the liquid be conductive and still be able to store electrons on the surface of the activated carbon?

According to http://www.theactivatedcarbon.com/page/activated-carbon-properties/" 10 grams of activated carbon would provide 15,000m^2 of surface area to store electrons on.
Thoughts?

Thank you for your help

-Tay
 

Attachments

  • electroscope_circuit_2.jpg
    electroscope_circuit_2.jpg
    14.5 KB · Views: 539
Last edited by a moderator:
Your c-pot sounds like a simple transistor.
If you statically charge a piece of activated carbon, it won't store much more charge then an equally big sphere.
In a super capacitor the large surface area gives you a large capacitance, however if you just put that activated carbon into an insulating liquid and apply a charge to it you don't get a capacitor effect. The capacity will be very small. The charge will not distribute over the entire surface area. It will only be at the outside. All the surface area on the inside will stay free of charge.
To get a large capacitance the carbon needs to be in a conductive liquid. But then you can only apply a small voltage.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
7K
Replies
13
Views
5K
Replies
12
Views
32K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K