B Can Newton's G and the "Einstein Scalar" Be Related?

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter kent davidge
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Scalar
kent davidge
Messages
931
Reaction score
56
Is it possible to take the "Eistein Scalar" from the Einstein Tensor, like one can take the Ricci Scalar from the Ricci Tensor? If so, is the G of Newton's law the same as this "Einstein Scalar" or is it just the same symbol used in very different things.

(Sorry for my bad English. I think Meaning of G would be a better title for the thread.)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
kent davidge said:
Is it possible to take the "Eistein Scalar" from the Einstein Tensor, like one can take the Ricci Scalar from the Ricci Tensor? If so, is the G of Newton's law the same as this "Einstein Scalar" or is it just the same symbol used in very different things.

(Sorry for my bad English. I think Meaning of G would be a better title for the thread.)

The term isn't used much, but given the Ricci scalar ##R = R^a{}_a## , we can write the equivalent for the Einstein tensor, ##G^a{}_a = -R^a{}_a##. See for instance http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/gr/outline2.html.

In particular, note that ##R = R^a{}_a = -T^a{}_a##, while ##G^a{}_a = T^a{}_a##, thus ##G^a{}_a = -R^a{}_a##

Because one is just the negative of the other, people usually talk about the Ricci scalar ##R^a{}_a## and there's no real need to talk about ##G^a{}_a##.

Neither one is related to the G in Newton's law, which can be regarded as a unit conversion factor. Physically, the significance of R would be that if we choose a local orthonormal frame, ##R = \rho - P_{xx} - P_{yy} - P_{zz}## or in the case where the pressure is isotropic, ##R = \rho - 3P##. Here ##\rho## is the density (energy per unit volume), and P is the pressure (or the x, y, and z components of the pressure if they're not all the same).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes kent davidge
pervect said:
The term isn't used much, but given the Ricci scalar ##R = R^a{}_a## , we can write the equivalent for the Einstein tensor, ##G^a{}_a = -R^a{}_a##. See for instance http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/gr/outline2.html.

In particular, note that ##R = R^a{}_a = -T^a{}_a##, while ##G^a{}_a = T^a{}_a##, thus ##G^a{}_a = -R^a{}_a##

Because one is just the negative of the other, people usually talk about the Ricci scalar ##R^a{}_a## and there's no real need to talk about ##G^a{}_a##.

Neither one is related to the G in Newton's law, which can be regarded as a unit conversion factor. Physically, the significance of R would be that if we choose a local orthonormal frame, ##R = \rho - P_{xx} - P_{yy} - P_{zz}## or in the case where the pressure is isotropic, ##R = \rho - 3P##. Here ##\rho## is the density (energy per unit volume), and P is the pressure (or the x, y, and z components of the pressure if they're not all the same).
Many thanks.
 
You're welcome - I should probably add that I followed Baez's lead in glossing over some constant conversions factors when I wrote ##G_{aa} = T_{aa}## rather than ##G_{aa} = 8 \pi T_{aa}## or even ##G_{aa} = (8 \pi G / c^4) T_{aa}##.
 
  • Like
Likes kent davidge
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top