Can non-zero translations be composed of two reflections in perpendicular lines?

  • Thread starter Thread starter zcdfhn
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the mathematical proof that every non-zero translation can be expressed as a composition of two reflections across lines that are perpendicular to the direction of a given vector. The context involves complex numbers and transformations in the plane.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to express the translation in terms of reflections but expresses uncertainty about the next steps after establishing the direction orthogonal to the vector. Other participants question the nature of reflections being discussed and clarify the distinction between reflections and rotations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights into the properties of reflections and suggesting geometric constructions to illustrate the relationship between reflections and translations. There is a mix of interpretations regarding the definitions and applications of reflections in this context.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note potential confusion regarding the definitions of reflections versus rotations, and there are indications of specific formulas and conditions that must be satisfied for the transformations being discussed.

zcdfhn
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
Prove that every non-zero translation Tb is a composition of two reflections in lines which are perpendicular to the direction of vector b.

Note: Tb(z) = z+b where z,b\inC

My guess at how to start this is to assume b = rei\theta where r = |b| and \theta=arg b, so then the direction of b is b/|b| = ei\theta. Therefore the unit vector with the direction orthogonal to b would be c = ei(\theta + \pi/2). From there, I am shaky about what to do. I attempted to create two reflection f,g that reflection over lines with the same direction as c and I attempted to do g\circf and I should end up with Tb but my work gets more and more complicated.

Thanks for your help.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What kind of formula do you know for a reflection? The reflections you are talking about not just reflections through the origin. You'll never get a translation out of that.
 
I know M(z) = a(z-bar)+b, where |a| = 1 and a \neq 1, a(b-bar) + b = 0

and i also know M(z) = z0 + ei2\eta(zbar - z0bar)
 
You seem to be confusing "reflection" with "rotation". re^{i\theta} will give a rotation by angle \theta together with an expansion (or contraction) by r, not a reflection. Given any point p, draw the straight line between p and Tb(p) and draw lines L1 and L2 perpendicular to that line 1/3 and 3/4 of the way between p and Tb(p). If R1 is reflection in L1, R1(p) will be the point, p2, exactly half way between p and Tb[/sup](p), and reflection of p2 in L2 will be Tb will be Tb(p) itself. Show that successive reflections of any point x in L1 and then L2 will give Tb[/sup](x).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
4K
Replies
67
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
20K