Can overlapping divergences be disentangled ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter zetafunction
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Overlapping
zetafunction
Messages
371
Reaction score
0
given an overlapping divergence

\int_{0}^{\infty} \int_{0}^{\infty}dxdy \frac{xy}{xy+1+x}

what terms must i add and substract in order to get it finite

can an overlapping divergence be disentangled and expressed as a product of one loop divergent integrals ??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi zetafunction,

Sector decomposition gives a recursive approach to disentangling overlapping divergences.
For a more direct approach you could modify the parametric BPH-procedure in the final reference below.

Sector decomposition:
By making the change of variables x->(1-x)/x and sim for y, you can make the integrals go from 0 to 1 with the entangled divergence at x=y=0.
Then, following the first example in the Heinrich paper below and splitting the integral into a x > y = t x part and a y > x = t y part, you can disentangle the divergences.
You can do the t-integral first, using a BPH-like Taylor series subtraction at t=0 to get a finite result for the first integral. Then in the x>y sector, the second integral is divergent at x=1. Another BPH subtraction gives a final result.

Following this procedure I find the integral = 2. Of course, this is completely subtraction dependent. To find what the subtractions from the original integrand are you can reverse the procedure. (Although I have to admit, I struggled with that last bit)
I can email you my Mathematica notebook if you wish.


I've put a couple of references below. The final one is a nice explanation/proof of BPH procedure in parametric space - something that I found very useful last year.

G. Heinrich, "Sector Decomposition," International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 23, 2008, p. 1457.

A.V. Smirnov and V.A. Smirnov, "Hepp and Speer Sectors within Modern Strategies of Sector Decomposition," Strategies, 2008.

M.C. Bergère and J.B. Zuber, "Renormalization of Feynman amplitudes and parametric integral representation," Communications in Mathematical Physics, vol. 35, 1974, pp. 113-140.

More references at http://www.mendeley.com/research-papers/collections/15779/FeynmanIntegrals/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
By the way, a quick analytic regularization, multiplying the integrand by f(a)x^a gives
\frac{f(a) (\pi \csc (\pi a))}{a^2+a}+O(a) = \frac{1}{a^2}+\frac{f'(0)-1}{a}+\left(\frac{f''(0)}{2}-f'(0)+\frac{\pi ^2}{6}+1\right)+O\left(a\right)
 
thanks SImon..

by the way by using a change of variable (if we are in R^{n} ) to n-polar coordinates so the new integral depend on the modulus r and the angles so

\int_{\Omega}\int_{0}^{\infty} f(r, \Omega _{í} )r^{n-1}dr

then if the divergent is just an ultraviolet one , integration over angles let us a divergent integral of the form \int_{0}^{\infty} g(r) r^{n-1}dr

for some g(r)
 
Thread 'LQG Legend Writes Paper Claiming GR Explains Dark Matter Phenomena'
A new group of investigators are attempting something similar to Deur's work, which seeks to explain dark matter phenomena with general relativity corrections to Newtonian gravity is systems like galaxies. Deur's most similar publication to this one along these lines was: One thing that makes this new paper notable is that the corresponding author is Giorgio Immirzi, the person after whom the somewhat mysterious Immirzi parameter of Loop Quantum Gravity is named. I will be reviewing the...
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2503.09804 From the abstract: ... Our derivation uses both EE and the Newtonian approximation of EE in Part I, to describe semi-classically in Part II the advection of DM, created at the level of the universe, into galaxies and clusters thereof. This advection happens proportional with their own classically generated gravitational field g, due to self-interaction of the gravitational field. It is based on the universal formula ρD =λgg′2 for the densityρ D of DM...
Back
Top