Can PF Random Thoughts be Split to Help with Server Load?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Evo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Random Thoughts
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the splitting of larger threads to alleviate server load, specifically continuing the Random Thoughts thread. Participants express their thoughts on various topics, including the emotional impact of the game Bioshock: Infinite, which one user describes as "haunting." They discuss the game's cover art, noting the absence of the female co-lead, Elizabeth, from the front cover, and reference an interview with Ken Levine that suggests this was a marketing compromise. The conversation shifts to personal anecdotes, including family dynamics and humorous observations about everyday life, such as experiences at McDonald's and the challenges of parenting toddlers. The thread features a blend of light-hearted banter, reflections on gaming, and casual storytelling, highlighting the community's camaraderie.
  • #2,951
On a different note, ...

'Just ordered a new T-shirt today. This one says,

DON'T BE A
\frac{d^3 x}{dt^3}
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2,952
don't be a jerk?
 
  • #2,953
Yes, that's the idea. :smile:
 
  • #2,954
Clever way of expressing that :D velocity -> acceleration -> jerk - wouldn't work in my language, though :( the word for "jerk" and jerk (as in don't be a jerk) are too different :/ Did you think of that or where'd you get it? :o
 
  • #2,955
I live in the USA, so it works.

Of course, it can't top my

Entropy
It's not what it used to be

T-shirt though. Once, while wearing the shirt, I was explaining what entropy was to my girlfriend at the time. I got so excited and animated about the gloriousness of the 2nd law that she almost broke up with me on the spot.
 
  • #2,956
Slav defence sucks...why won't anyone accept?
 
  • #2,957
collinsmark said:
T-shirt though. Once, while wearing the shirt, I was explaining what entropy was to my girlfriend at the time. I got so excited and animated about the gloriousness of the 2nd law that she almost broke up with me on the spot.
Entropy affects even her xD Was she jealous of you being more enthusiastic about science rather than her? (woman-esque thinking xD )
 
  • #2,958
collinsmark said:
Entropy
It's not what it used to be


Lemme guess...NOT 0K?
:-p
 
  • #2,959
lendav_rott said:
Entropy affects even her xD Was she jealous of you being more enthusiastic about science rather than her? (woman-esque thinking xD )

I think it was just that I got so incredibly enthusiastic about the 2nd law, it sort of freaked her out. Most of the time I have the personality of a doorknob.

Enigman said:
Lemme guess...NOT 0K?
:-p

Nothing so specific. 'Just the fact that entropy is greater now than it was just a moment ago, or even at any time in the past, ever.

(Yes, funny though about the "NOT 0K." I never thought of that. I might use that in the future.)
 
  • #2,960
collinsmark said:
I think it was just that I got so incredibly enthusiastic about the 2nd law, it sort of freaked her out. Most of the time I have the personality of a doorknob.
Nothing so specific. 'Just the fact that entropy is greater now than it was just a moment ago, or even at any time in the past, ever.

Don't be so open about it...
:devil:closed [ed]isolated[/ed] system, closing apostrophe and your personality...
P.S. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Absolute_zero
just making sure...and making a fool out of myself.
 
Last edited:
  • #2,961
Enigman said:
P.S. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Absolute_zero
just making sure...and making a fool out of myself.

Yes, yes. Very nice. I did not overlook the humor. :smile:

"NOT 0K" is a play on words between "Not okay" and "Not 0 Kelvin." Zero Kelvin being, in strict thermodynamic terms, the lowest entropy possible.

And "don't be so open" being another sort of play on words: strictly speaking, entropy never decreases in a closed system. Thermodynamic entropy can decrease in an open system, where "open" is such that other things "outside" the system are not considered in the overall picture, even though in truth, they interact with things within the system. (An "open system" is really an incomplete view of the true, overall system.)

So yes, Very good. :smile:
 
  • #2,962
Thankee milord!
I am still paranoid that people don't get my avataar...:redface:
 
  • #2,963
Enigman said:
Thankee milord!
I am still paranoid that people don't get my avataar...:redface:
Clown and old man. We aren't that oblivious. :-p
 
  • #2,964
Mandelbroth said:
Clown and old man. We aren't that oblivious. :-p

I am...
 
  • #2,965
Morning headlines

26 Florida children or teenagers have been killed in “stand your ground”-related cases, reports Nicole Flatow for ThinkProgress.

http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2014/02/05/3252511/jordan-davis-26-children-teens-died-florida-stand-ground-cases/


Oops –> The Koch brothers left a list of VIP donors at a hotel. MoJo’s Andy Kroll and Daniel Schulman report its significance.

http://billmoyers.com/2014/02/06/th...tial-document-at-their-last-donor-conference/
 
  • #2,966
It's been raining here in drought-ridden San Diego since late afternoon. It's forecast to end tomorrow AM, so it's no cure. However, 13 billion gastropods that were hanging on by the skin of their teeth are out celebrating in force, crawling crazily over the sidewalks and streets, drunk with moisture. Many casualties are expected.
 
  • #2,968
what is the plural for the word radius? Radiiiiiiiiiiiiii? English is great and all, but this is too much
 
  • #2,969
lendav_rott said:
what is the plural for the word radius? Radiiiiiiiiiiiiii? English is great and all, but this is too much

Its all [STRIKE]greek[/STRIKE] latin to me...
 
  • #2,970
Enigman said:

rare ma ladii?

----------------------------
Malady --> My lady --> Ma lady --> ma ladii
sorry, but I'm in a quite peculiar mood today.
2+4+1 = 7, and then there's another 7, and it's the 7th, and european ones look like sevens, and it's snowing, and I have the day off.
ps. And I can totally relate to finding a doctor who says; "Wow!"
 
  • #2,971
I went to a class on Thursday and they said it would cost between $20,000 and $40,000 to file a patent.

Ideas are expensive.
 
  • #2,972
OmCheeto said:
I went to a class on Thursday and they said it would cost between $20,000 and $40,000 to file a patent.

Ideas are expensive.
I suspect the bulk of that must be legal fees for the patent attorney. What's the actual fee charged by the patent office?
 
  • #2,973
OmCheeto said:
Ideas are expensive.
Everything is expensive. :-p
 
  • #2,974
Mandelbroth said:
Everything is expensive. :-p

The class was free. They even gave us cookies.
 
  • #2,975
OmCheeto said:
The class was free. They even gave us cookies.
The cookie is a lie. :smile:
 
  • #2,976
zoobyshoe said:
I suspect the bulk of that must be legal fees for the patent attorney. What's the actual fee charged by the patent office?

I have not a clue. The list of fees is about 7 miles long. But I was warned by an associate that I should not spend less than $10k on attorney's fees. He claims to be the author of some software that is being used around the country right now.

ps. I just spent 3 hours taking the USPTO 30 minute "Basic Patent Training For Independent Inventors and Small Businesses" certification package.

I used to think word problems were hard...
 
  • #2,977
Migraines are not fun.
 
  • #2,978
OmCheeto said:
I have not a clue. The list of fees is about 7 miles long. But I was warned by an associate that I should not spend less than $10k on attorney's fees. He claims to be the author of some software that is being used around the country right now.

ps. I just spent 3 hours taking the USPTO 30 minute "Basic Patent Training For Independent Inventors and Small Businesses" certification package.

I used to think word problems were hard...
I'm pretty sure a lone inventor would be a "micro-entity," and would be charged $70 for filing. One point of an attorney, I guess, is that he/she would be able to figure out what other of the myriad complications apply to your invention.
 
  • #2,979
zoobyshoe said:
I'm pretty sure a lone inventor would be a "micro-entity," and would be charged $70 for filing.
Sweet!

$40k is almost twice what I paid for my house.

One point of an attorney, I guess, is that he/she would be able to figure out what other of the myriad complications apply to your invention.

It's not complicated at all.

It's the word problems that bother me. Where's berned_you when I need her... :cry:
 
Last edited:
  • #2,980
mandelbroth said:
the cookie is a lie. :smile:

Half Life 3 confirmed
 
  • #2,981
WannabeNewton said:
Half Life 3 confirmed

I am pretty busy this weekend, but 4/4/14 looks quite promising :biggrin:
 
  • #2,982
zoobyshoe said:
One point of an attorney, I guess, is that he/she would be able to figure out what other of the myriad complications apply to your invention.

Close, but the real point of an attorney is to figure out things that you didn't know about, and then charge you $500 an hour to explain them. The importance and/or level of complication doesn't matter much, so long as you can pay the hourly rate.

Actually, this is the same system that the military used to use for developing new toys to play with, except they called it "cost-plus accounting". Spend as much as you like, send in the bill with a 30% markup, and no questions asked :smile:
 
  • #2,983
Enigman said:
Migraines are not fun.

:frown: I can confirm this.

A low-tech trick: ice pack to the back of your head/neck, and rest in a quiet, dark room. High-tech trick: injectable Imatrex.

Oh and caffeine, of course.
 
  • #2,984
lisab said:
:frown: I can confirm this.

A low-tech trick: ice pack to the back of your head/neck, and rest in a quiet, dark room.

When I had them, the trick was to do this before they fully developed.
 
  • #2,985
lisab said:
:frown: I can confirm this.

A low-tech trick: ice pack to the back of your head/neck, and rest in a quiet, dark room. High-tech trick: injectable Imatrex.

Oh and caffeine, of course.

Thanks milady, but have too much to get done to rest right now.
 
  • #2,986
zoobyshoe said:
I suspect the bulk of that must be legal fees for the patent attorney. What's the actual fee charged by the patent office?

In 2004 it was around $1500-$2000 and about ten-K more for the patent attorney. The patent attorney is probably necessary expense because there's standards for drawings and terminology, and the patent attorney is well connected to translate your idea into that bizarre patent office language.


One can file a "provisional patent" himself for a few hundred bucks BUT - that starts a clock. You have one more year to obtain a real patent, or lose rights to it.
 
  • #2,987
OmCheeto said:
Ideas are expensive.

A lack of ideas is probably more expensive, in the long run.
 
  • #2,988
I'm watching this Beatles tribute on CBS. The last remaining Beatles are shown sitting in the front row: Paul, Ringo, and Yoko.

Less than an hour to go before Paul and Ringo take the stage.
 
  • #2,989
OmCheeto said:
I have not a clue. The list of fees is about 7 miles long. But I was warned by an associate that I should not spend less than $10k on attorney's fees. He claims to be the author of some software that is being used around the country right now.

ps. I just spent 3 hours taking the USPTO 30 minute "Basic Patent Training For Independent Inventors and Small Businesses" certification package.

I used to think word problems were hard...
I don't know what you are trying to patent, but you might be interested in this new book, she's a very successful entrepreneur and on the investor TV show "shark tank" where she financially backs inventors.

Review
Advance praise for Invent It, Sell It, Bank It!

“I am used to dealing with Mavericks and Lori fits the bill! Lori Greiner’s insightful and practical book, Invent It, Sell It, Bank It! should be on the required reading list for anyone who wants to take an idea and turn it into a real business.”—Mark Cuban

“While most people write a book to make money, it’s evident in reading Invent It, Sell It, Bank It! that Lori’s goal is to share her secrets with the reader, and make them money.”—Mark Burnett

“Inventors, look no further—Lori Greiner’s book has it all. It’s fast, it’s fun to read, and it’s packed with all the information you need to turn your big idea into a huge success.”—New York Times bestselling author Gary Vaynerchuk, CEO, Vaynermedia

https://www.amazon.com/dp/0804176434/?tag=pfamazon01-20
 
  • #2,990
I should be asleep. I should have done my work. But I'm here on PF...I think I need help :rolleyes:
 
  • #2,991
zoobyshoe said:
I'm watching this Beatles tribute on CBS. The last remaining Beatles are shown sitting in the front row: Paul, Ringo, and Yoko.

Less than an hour to go before Paul and Ringo take the stage.

It was the 50th anniversary of their appearance on the Ed Sullivan Show in 1964. It's somewhat horrible to know I saw that broadcast.
 
  • #2,992
Evo said:
I don't know what you are trying to patent, but you might be interested in this new book, she's a very successful entrepreneur and on the investor TV show "shark tank" where she financially backs inventors.

https://www.amazon.com/dp/0804176434/?tag=pfamazon01-20

Yippie! Thank you Evo. Remind me, when this is all over with, that I owe you an extra $20 million.

Available March 11, 2014
I'll pick it up at the local bookstore. In the meanwhile, I should probably read Jim Clifton's book again.

Wow:
wiki said:
Lori Greiner
...
Her first patent was a plastic jewelry organizer for earrings which generated $500 million in sales.
...
 
  • #2,993
Why the hell does my bedroom smell like sweaty socks :/
 
  • #2,994
zoobyshoe said:
It was the 50th anniversary of their appearance on the Ed Sullivan Show in 1964. It's somewhat horrible to know I saw that broadcast.
Like it was yesterday. Parents out for the evening, chair placed 3 feet in front of B&W TV, eyes glued on screen. Outstanding.
 
  • #2,995
I find probability theory hilarious...no idea why.
 
  • #2,996
Enigman said:
I find probability theory hilarious...no idea why.

... :rolleyes: ... ?!

(Probability/statistics was never my area of specialty, but as time goes on I have grown a deep fascination with and respect for the subject. The Central Limit Theorem is one of my favorites. [And contemplating that knowing that the Gaussian normal shape is the wavefunction shape that has minimal uncertainty in quantum mechanics {Although in fairness, the minimal uncertainty can be explained as the result of its Fourier Transform properties}].)
 
  • #2,997
dlgoff said:
Like it was yesterday. Parents out for the evening, chair placed 3 feet in front of B&W TV, eyes glued on screen. Outstanding.
I was 8, and don't vividly remember the performance at all. What I remember was the infectious excitement with which my oldest sister (then age 15) experienced the show. We three younger kids were sucked up into it and hypnotized by her into believing it was the most important television event in the history of the world. Like it beat seeing Oswald get shot live on TV.
 
  • #2,998
There's a show on History Channel called MonsterQuest. I fell asleep this afternoon during their quest for albino sperm whales. I dreamt they reported finding a whole pod of white sperm whales in the Antarctic; an unknown Arctic variety of them. Polar whales, like polar bears.

Anyway, apparently I started a thread about them and dreamt I was checking replies to the thread. I kept scrolling up and down and couldn't make out any of the replies. I just had a vague impression of what they said.

In my case what they say is true: you can't read in dreams.
 
  • #2,999
zoobyshoe said:
There's a show on History Channel called MonsterQuest. I fell asleep this afternoon during their quest for albino sperm whales. I dreamt they reported finding a whole pod of white sperm whales in the Antarctic; an unknown Arctic variety of them. Polar whales, like polar bears.

Anyway, apparently I started a thread about them and dreamt I was checking replies to the thread. I kept scrolling up and down and couldn't make out any of the replies. I just had a vague impression of what they said.

In my case what they say is true: you can't read in dreams.
I can read in dreams, my nightmare this morning was reading an instruction manual for a cell phone. I could read everything just fine, but was having hell making the darn thing work. What was funny was that all of the live information in the lists of calls received and messages left were all in the printed manual and scrollable, as if they were on the phone. They were easier to use enlarged in the manual than on the actual phone. I can control my dreams so made that happen because I was getting frustrated.
 
  • #3,000
Evo said:
I can read in dreams, my nightmare this morning was reading an instruction manual for a cell phone. I could read everything just fine, but was having hell making the darn thing work. What was funny was that all of the live information in the lists of calls received and messages left were all in the printed manual and scrollable, as if they were on the phone. They were easier to use enlarged in the manual than on the actual phone. I can control my dreams so made that happen because I was getting frustrated.
Gferabtt ojjngdt koieeelpp nbbsg jns kkjshdy weroo palsne bd mmanuus paoee pldjyt onjuhdt sddgtf whoud wq s whsbut. Thend ondg okndgfy jg bnoieby agmwot. Npu teow nboslt e.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2K
Views
167K
Replies
3K
Views
156K
Replies
348
Views
49K
Replies
4K
Views
231K
36
Replies
2K
Views
53K
  • Sticky
Replies
0
Views
4K
Replies
40
Views
17K
Back
Top