Can potential energy be negative at infinity?

AI Thread Summary
Potential energy can be negative depending on the chosen reference point, as it includes an arbitrary integration constant. The difference in potential energy (ΔU) is negative when an attractive force, such as gravity or Coulomb force, acts towards the center of the field, indicating energy release as objects move closer. Conversely, if objects are displaced away from the center, ΔU becomes positive, requiring energy input. The concept of "zero at infinity" means that potential energy can be set to zero as the distance from a chosen origin approaches infinity, making it easier to analyze energy changes. This principle applies to various force fields, including gravitational and magnetic potentials, although the latter involves additional complexities.
Entanglement
Messages
438
Reaction score
13
When can the potential be in a negative value especially when it come to atoms and bind formation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Potential energy can have negative value whenever you like, since the formula includes the integration constant that can be set to an arbitrary value. That's why we usually only concern ourselves with the difference between potential energies at some two points in the field(ΔU).

If you want to know when is the difference in PE negative, then it depends on the direction of the force and the direction of displacement.

When the force is attractive, like with gravity, strong nuclear force, or Coulomb force for odd charges, AND the displacement is towards the centre of the field, then the ΔU is negative. Meaning, there is a release of energy as the objects comprising the system get closer.
If the displacement is away from the centre of the field, the ΔU is positive - it requires input of energy to move the objects apart.

In a repulsive force field(e.g., like charges repelling) it is the other way around.
 
Bandersnatch said:
Potential energy can have negative value whenever you like, since the formula includes the integration constant that can be set to an arbitrary value. That's why we usually only concern ourselves with the difference between potential energies at some two points in the field(ΔU).
If you want to know when is the difference in PE negative, then it depends on the direction of the force and the direction of displacement.
When the force is attractive, like with gravity, strong nuclear force, or Coulomb force for odd charges, AND the displacement is towards the centre of the field, then the ΔU is negative. Meaning, there is a release of energy as the objects comprising the system get closer.

If the displacement is away from the centre of the field, the ΔU is positive - it requires input of energy to move the objects apart.
In a repulsive force field(e.g., like charges repelling) it is the other way around.
Yeah yeah I got your point that potential energy is an arbitrary value, but but if we consider a metal is out of a Magnet's magnetic field it's potential should be zero but saying the potential is zero is a little bit misleading as it could be in the field and it's potential is still zero as it's an arbitrary value, how can I precisely say that the body is out of the field in terms of potential energy ?
 
Just set the potential energy to be zero at infinity.
 
Bandersnatch said:
Just set the potential energy to be zero at infinity.
What is meant by zero at infinity ?
 
ElmorshedyDr said:
What is meant by zero at infinity ?

Rigorously, this means that one sets the integral used to define potential energy equal to zero at the limit as distance from some chosen origin goes to infinity. I think the simplest example is gravitational potential energy. Have you taken calculus? You don't really need calculus to get this idea, but the argument is a bit more "hand-wavey". Using gravity, you can find a value for ##r## that will make the potential energy arbitrarily close to 0. You just need to choose larger and larger values of ##r##. In the limit, one says that the potential energy is "zero at infinity" to mean that one can make the potential arbitrarily close to zero by taking a larger ##r##.

You can apply the same idea to magnetic potential energy, but it is a bit trickier because the angle of the dipole also matters.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top