Can Pure Math Experience a Paradigm Shift Without Experimental Validation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Organic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Shift
AI Thread Summary
A paradigm shift in pure mathematics differs from that in physics, as it relies on deep changes in fundamental concepts rather than experimental validation. Discussions highlight the need for new theories to undergo rigorous testing, although the nature of such tests remains ambiguous due to the absence of empirical experiments in mathematics. The conversation emphasizes the importance of creativity and usefulness in driving these shifts, suggesting that innovative thinking can lead to significant changes in mathematical understanding. Participants reference the philosophical aspects of mathematics, including ontology, formalism, and epistemology, and discuss historical influences like the Bourbaki group, indicating a trend away from traditional approaches. The integration of new perspectives is seen as essential for evolving mathematical thought, with some asserting that creativity plays a crucial role in facilitating these shifts.
Organic
Messages
1,223
Reaction score
0
Hi,

A Paradigm Shift happens in physics mostly when fundamental concepts of some system are deeply changed by a new theory and/or new experimental results that supporting and/or triggering a new theory for enough long time.

Pure Mathematics has no experimental side like physics, therefore a Paradigm shift depends
on deep changes of our understanding fundamental concepts like: definition, logic, axiom, number, set, operation, limit, function, infinity and so on.

My question is this, because there are no experiments that determine the validity of some theory, what kind of tests can some new theory has to “pass” until a paradigm shift really happens in Pure Math?

Another question on the same subject:

What do you think is the “nature” of a paradigm shift in a pure theoretical system?

Thank you,

Organic
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Revolutionary views on the philosophy of mathematics inevitably involve a novel perspective on the ontology of maths, the formalism of maths, and the epistemology of maths. These are the three major issues of mathematics.
 
Organic said:
Hi,

A Paradigm Shift happens in physics mostly when fundamental concepts of some system are deeply changed by a new theory and/or new experimental results that supporting and/or triggering a new theory for enough long time.
...

Here is a great page about Thomas Kuhn ("The Structure of Scientific Revolutions", 1962) and his ideas

http://www.emory.edu/EDUCATION/mfp/Kuhnsnap.html
 
Dear marcus,

I really want to know what do you think about a paradigm shift in pure mathematics?
 
Last edited:
Hi Stevo,
Revolutionary views on the philosophy of mathematics inevitably involve a novel perspective on the ontology of maths, the formalism of maths, and the epistemology of maths. These are the three major issues of mathematics.
Can you give an example of this novel perspective?
 
My question is this, because there are no experiments that determine the validity of some theory, what kind of tests can some new theory has to ?pass? until a paradigm shift really happens in Pure Math?

Usefulness.
 
"creative thinking"

Creative thoughts lead to a "Paradigm Shift" The mathematics come later. Is not mathematics proofs of what is already known.
 
Hi Hurkyl,
Hurkyl said:
Usefulness.
And what if a paradigm shift in some language (and Math is first of all a form of language) includes in it the meaning of "Usefulness"?
 
Last edited:
Rader,
Creative thoughts lead to a "Paradigm Shift" The mathematics come later.
Do you mean that a paradigm shift starting (in some sence) out of what is called mathematical system?
 
  • #10
Organic said:
Hi Stevo,

Can you give an example of this novel perspective?

Bourbaki are one of the most infamous.
 
  • #11
And the modern trend away from Bourbaki, too, mainly coming from the pedagogical influence in the last 30 years. (The let 2=n school.)
 
  • #12
Organic said:
Rader,

Do you mean that a paradigm shift starting (in some sence) out of what is called mathematical system?

If all knowledge was in essence, mathematics, the answer would be yes. Although mathematical proofs exits, of things we are not sure exist, are they anything more than creativity? If all knowledge was in essece "Reality" mathematics would be a subset of it. Creativity seems to be a sign of genius, at least, that is what I have learned from history. Thats why I posted what I did. Creativity would be a tapping of that database, to change the paradigm, mathematics would be one of its finer tools.

That is the way I see it to be, mine being a world view of a non-mathematician.
 
Last edited:
  • #13
The paradigm shift in physics has already occured, see http://paradigm.blogharbor.com

Mathematics was not capable of representing the true quantitative nature of the process of the Universe.

This new physics paradigm, through symmetry across the sub-atomic/atomic and biology domains, integrates science.

Stephen Mooney
 
Back
Top