Can Radiation Losses Be Recovered in Nuclear Fusion for Net Power Gain?

  • Thread starter Thread starter TESL@
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Loss Radiation
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the challenges of radiation losses in nuclear fusion and the potential methods for recovering these losses to achieve net power gain. Participants explore various confinement methods, reactions, and the implications of radiation losses, particularly in the context of different fusion approaches such as D-T and p-B fusion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that radiation losses are frequently cited as the primary obstacle to achieving net power gain in fusion research, with specific mention of companies like Tri-Alpha Energy and LPP focusing on this issue.
  • Another participant questions the feasibility of generating electricity from electron cyclotron waves using a rectenna array, arguing that the radiation is not coherent and that radio waves may not constitute a significant portion of the emitted power.
  • Concerns are raised regarding the harsh radiation and temperature conditions that limit the materials that can be placed near the plasma, complicating the recovery of radiation losses.
  • One participant inquires specifically about bremsstrahlung and mentions the possibility of inverse-bremsstrahlung as a potential avenue for energy recovery.
  • A later reply emphasizes that p-B fusion requires much higher temperatures than D-T fusion, making bremsstrahlung a significant concern for p-B fusion, potentially hindering its viability.
  • It is noted that in a burning D-T plasma, a substantial portion of energy is lost via neutrons, with a focus suggested on capturing this energy efficiently, while also acknowledging that turbulence may dominate the remaining energy losses.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the methods for recovering radiation losses and the implications of bremsstrahlung in different fusion scenarios. There is no consensus on the best approach or the feasibility of the proposed methods.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the complexity of radiation losses in fusion, including the dependence on temperature and ion charge, as well as the challenges posed by material limitations in high-radiation environments. Specific assumptions about the efficiency of various energy recovery methods remain unresolved.

TESL@
Messages
122
Reaction score
8
Hello,

After researching on many kinds of confinement methods and most promising reactions, (aneutronic fusion etc.) I saw almost every paper complained about radiation losses as the greatest problem preventing net power gain. And except Tri-Alpha Energy and LPP (Dense Plasma Focus) companies, nobody seems to be caring about recovering these losses. Since degenerate plasma is not practical aside from inertial confinement, the radiation must either be harvested or sent back to the plasma. So, why don't they just generate electricity from electron cyclotron waves by a rectenna array, and in return heat the ions by ICRH? What about bremsstrahlung? Is there no possibility but inefficient photoelectric converters?

Thank you.
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
TESL@ said:
So, why don't they just generate electricity from electron cyclotron waves by a rectenna array
The radiation is not coherent, and I don't think radio waves make up a significant part of the emitted power.

The harsh radiation and temperature conditions also limit the number of things you can place next to the plasma. It is hard enough to find some material for the first wall, even without additional functionality.
 
TESL@ said:
After researching on many kinds of confinement methods and most promising reactions, (aneutronic fusion etc.) I saw almost every paper complained about radiation losses as the greatest problem preventing net power gain. And except Tri-Alpha Energy and LPP (Dense Plasma Focus) companies, nobody seems to be caring about recovering these losses. Since degenerate plasma is not practical aside from inertial confinement, the radiation must either be harvested or sent back to the plasma. So, why don't they just generate electricity from electron cyclotron waves by a rectenna array, and in return heat the ions by ICRH? What about bremsstrahlung? Is there no possibility but inefficient photoelectric converters?
Both Tri-alpha and Lpp are interested in p-B fusion. p-B fusion requires orders of magnitude hotter temperatures than D-T fusion. The power radiated by Bremsstrahlung increases with both temperature and ion charge. For p-B fusion Bremsstrahlung is a potential show stopper for p-B fusion. Its a huge issue!

In a burning D-T plasma, 80% of the energy is lost via the neutron. This is the lions share of the energy, and the focus should be on capturing this energy efficiently (neutrons are also important because they are used to breed tritium). The remaining 20% of the energy is lost via various conduction, convection, and radiation mechanisms. I expect that various turbulant losses will dominate the remaining 20%. Turbulance dominates the heat loss in modern high performance tokamaks and stellarators.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
6K