Can Relative Velocities Exceed the Speed of Light?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cbd1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relative
cbd1
Messages
123
Reaction score
1
This is a quite simple question, and hopefully a simple answer. I know the basics of SR and GR, but I'm bothered by this one. It seems that by adding speeds you can get speeds greater than c.

Say we have 4 observers on 4 different bodies. Each observer believes his body to be a rest. We will say that all observers line up to form a straight line progressing from observer 1 -> 4.

Observer 1 views observer 2's body to be moving away at 1/2 c. Oberserver 2 views observer 3 to be moving away at 1/2 c. And observer 3 sees observer 4 to be moving away at 1/2 c. This would mean that observer 4 was moving away from observer 1 at 1 1/2 c. How is the universal maximum c not broken here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
cbd1 said:
This is a quite simple question, and hopefully a simple answer. I know the basics of SR and GR, but I'm bothered by this one. It seems that by adding speeds you can get speeds greater than c.

Say we have 4 observers on 4 different bodies. Each observer believes his body to be a rest. We will say that all observers line up to form a straight line progressing from observer 1 -> 4.

Observer 1 views observer 2's body to be moving away at 1/2 c. Oberserver 2 views observer 3 to be moving away at 1/2 c. And observer 3 sees observer 4 to be moving away at 1/2 c. This would mean that observer 4 was moving away from observer 1 at 1 1/2 c. How is the universal maximum c not broken here?
According to the Lorentz transformation velocities don't add in the way they do in classical physics, instead you have to use the relativistic velocity addition formula. For example, if observer 2 sees observer 3 moving at 0.5c, and observer 1 sees observer 2 moving at 0.5c in the same direction, then observer 1 will see observer 3 moving at (0.5c + 0.5c)/(1 + 0.5*0.5) = 1c/1.25 = 0.8c. Then if observer 3 sees observer 4 moving at 0.5c and observer 1 sees observer 3 moving at 0.8c, that means observer 1 sees observer 4 moving at (0.5c + 0.8c)/(1 + 0.5*0.8) = 1.3c/1.4 = 0.93c.

The fact that velocities don't add in the same way as they do in classical physics has to do with the fact that each observer measures velocity in terms of distance/time on a set of rulers and synchronized clocks at rest relative to themselves, but each observer sees the measurements of rulers and clocks of other observers distorted by length contraction, time dilation, and the relativity of simultaneity (which says that clocks synchronized in one frame will be out-of-sync in other frames).
 
Thanks Jesse for the quick response. That makes sense to me, I think I actually knew that at one time and forgot it. I hate when that happens. I don't use this stuff in my field so it fades out of memory fast.
 
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top