Can someone tell me why this method is wrong even though it seems logical?

  • Thread starter Thread starter lLovePhysics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    even Method
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the calculation of how much carbon dioxide can be absorbed by 1.00 kg of lithium hydroxide using the reaction equation. The user attempts to balance the equation and calculate the molar mass but struggles with the systematic approach to stoichiometry. They express confusion over their calculations, which yield a result of 919g CO2, while the book states the answer is 920g. The user acknowledges the importance of understanding the mole concept and stoichiometric ratios to avoid errors. A systematic method for approaching such problems is sought to improve accuracy in future calculations.
lLovePhysics
Messages
169
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Solid lithium hydroxide is used in space vehicles to remove exhaled carbon dioxide from the living environment by forming solid lithium carbonate and liquid water. What mass of gaseous carbon dioxide can be absorbed by 1.00kg of lithium hydroxide?



The Attempt at a Solution



First, I balanced out the equation with the reactants and products:

2LiOH+CO_2 \right arrow Li_{2}CO_{3}+H_{2}O

Then I found the molar mass of LiHO to be: 23.949g/ mol LiHO

So then I did this:

\frac{23.949g}{mol \\LiHO} \times \frac{2mol LiHO}{1molCO_{2}}=\frac{47.898g}{1molCO_2} \times \frac{1molCO_2}{44.01g}

Other than that the units cancel out.. can someone tell me why it is wrong and how to avoid these problems? As of now, I just try to cancel the units out to get grams but I don't really have a "systematic" way of doing things. Is there a a systematic way? How do avoid not knowing what you are doing and how to arrive at the right answer? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1000g LiOH \frac{(12.01+32.0)g CO_2}{2(6.941+16.0+1.01)g LiOH} = 919g CO_2

?
 
Last edited:
rocophysics said:
1000g LiOH \frac{(12.01+32.0)g CO_2}{2(6.941+16.0+1.01)g LiOH} = 14.8g CO_2

?

My book says the answer is 920g.
 
lLovePhysics said:
My book says the answer is 920g.
lol damn I'm way off, ok let me check

EDIT: ok i obviously shouldn't calculate in the dark, lol

i got 919g CO2

since you have a 2:1 stoichiometric ratio between LiOH and CO_2. i assume bc like to avoid writing too much, so i skip out on the moles and assume they cancel out nicely and just stick to the units that i am required in my answer.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top