Can stationary permanent magnet do work?

AI Thread Summary
A stationary permanent magnet can influence the energy dynamics of a coil wound around it, as the current in the coil generates a magnetic field that aligns with the magnet's field. The energy of the magnetic field is proportional to the square of the magnetic induction, leading to an increase in energy when both fields are combined. This raises the question of where the additional energy originates, especially since the magnet's magnetic domains cannot be altered by the electric force. If the current is significantly increased and the magnet is cooled to lose its magnetism, it may provide a greater energy boost to the coil than the energy consumed. The discussion suggests that more electrical energy is required to achieve the same magnetic field when the coil is wound around the permanent magnet compared to when they are separate.
goran d
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
We have a permanent saturated magnet. And a coil wound around it. The current produces magnetic field in same direction as the magnet. Now we know that the energy of magnetic field is proportional to the square of the magnetic induction.
E1=kB12
E2=kB22
Etotal=kB12+kB22+2kB1B2
We have an extra energy term when we add the fields. It grows proportionally with the current in the coil. The extra energy has to come from somwhere, or does it?
The magnet appears to be doing work in increasing the field.
This is fully compatible with Poynting Theorem. The integral of the dot product of the electric field and current density is equal to the increased energy. However, what that force is trying to do is to spin down the magnetic domains, which it can't do. So the electric force simply has no effect on the domains. Where does the extra energy come from?
If we increase the current to a very large value, can we then cool down the magnet, it to lose its magnetism, and it gives a much larger energy "boost" to the coil than the energy we spend?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
goran d said:
Now we know that the energy of magnetic field is proportional to the square of the magnetic induction.
Just a comment:

Edens = ½ * B * H [ J/m3 ] = ½ * B2 * μ

You say that the permanent magnet is saturated, so when extra H-field is added by the coil, μ → μ0 ( almost immediately ).

4-the-dc-generator-8-638.jpg
 
Consider what would happen if the coil magnet started off separate from the permanent magnet. You would have to do work to bring it into position, because being the same way round it would repel the permanent magnet. So the total energy would now be more than the sum of the energy of each separate field.

On that basis, one would expect to need more electrical energy to create the same amount of current (and hence that magnetic field) in the coil when it is wound round the permanent magnet than it would when it is separate.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top