Can Strings Always Split in String Theory?

  • Thread starter Thread starter David Baker
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Split Strings
David Baker
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
Something that's been unclear to me from the presentations I've seen of interacting string theory:

In a setting like bosonic string theory, where the interactions consist of strings splitting and joining, is it always possible for a string to split? In other words, are there "minimum-sized" strings that cannot be split further, but can only interact by joining? Or is it always possible for every string to enter into either type of interaction?

(For purposes of the question, let's say it's "possible for a string to split" if there's any non-zero amplitude at all for a split, even if splitting is extremely unlikely.)

Edit to add: References would be GREATLY appreciated!
 
  • Like
Likes arivero
Physics news on Phys.org
+1 to the question, and I add that I would like to see (read: to be pointed to) some actual calculation of the size of an string, specially in the fermionic case.

PS: as for the answer, my guess is that any point-size string coming out of an interaction will evolve in less than a Planck time to get a size of a Plank length. But again, it should be nice to see that explicitly.
 
Well I guess the most natural minimum size limit for a string would have to be the Planck's length...Otherwise you are getting a singularity...
At least that's the idea I got from Susskind's lecture on String and M-theory on youtube (although I haven't finished it yet)
 
Thread 'LQG Legend Writes Paper Claiming GR Explains Dark Matter Phenomena'
A new group of investigators are attempting something similar to Deur's work, which seeks to explain dark matter phenomena with general relativity corrections to Newtonian gravity is systems like galaxies. Deur's most similar publication to this one along these lines was: One thing that makes this new paper notable is that the corresponding author is Giorgio Immirzi, the person after whom the somewhat mysterious Immirzi parameter of Loop Quantum Gravity is named. I will be reviewing the...
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2503.09804 From the abstract: ... Our derivation uses both EE and the Newtonian approximation of EE in Part I, to describe semi-classically in Part II the advection of DM, created at the level of the universe, into galaxies and clusters thereof. This advection happens proportional with their own classically generated gravitational field g, due to self-interaction of the gravitational field. It is based on the universal formula ρD =λgg′2 for the densityρ D of DM...
Back
Top