Can the 5 brane of M theory turn into a 1 string?

Nav
Messages
37
Reaction score
1
Can the 5brane turn into a fundamental string?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are M-theory compactifications where the 5-brane can wrap 4 compact directions to give an object that is effectively a string in the limit where the size of the compact directions is very small. S-duality on these compactifications will switch the membrane and 5-brane so could lead to the identification of a wrapped 5-brane with the fundamental string in some dual theory.
 
fzero said:
There are M-theory compactifications where the 5-brane can wrap 4 compact directions to give an object that is effectively a string in the limit where the size of the compact directions is very small. S-duality on these compactifications will switch the membrane and 5-brane so could lead to the identification of a wrapped 5-brane with the fundamental string in some dual theory.
Ok, consider the following...
In M theory, the elementary string that creates all particles is formed when an M2 brane is wrapped tightly around the circular dimensions. Now, when the M2 turns into a string, can the string that is open (with end points) attach its end points to an M5 brane? I have read in only few sources that they can
 
Nav said:
Ok, consider the following...
In M theory, the elementary string that creates all particles is formed when an M2 brane is wrapped tightly around the circular dimensions. Now, when the M2 turns into a string, can the string that is open (with end points) attach its end points to an M5 brane? I have read in only few sources that they can

Yes, M-theory on a circle is dual to the IIA string theory. The wrapped M2-brane is identified with the fundamental string and the wrapped M5-brane is identified with a D4-brane. So a string ending on a D4-brane is identified with an M2-brane ending on an M5-brane. So we learn that, even in 11d, an M2-brane can attach to an M5-brane. The reference http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0412310 describes a solution for this system.
 
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
I'm trying to understand the relationship between the Higgs mechanism and the concept of inertia. The Higgs field gives fundamental particles their rest mass, but it doesn't seem to directly explain why a massive object resists acceleration (inertia). My question is: How does the Standard Model account for inertia? Is it simply taken as a given property of mass, or is there a deeper connection to the vacuum structure? Furthermore, how does the Higgs mechanism relate to broader concepts like...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
33
Views
7K
Back
Top