Can The Lagrangian L=T-V Be Derived?

  • Thread starter Thread starter morangta
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lagrangian
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Lagrangian, expressed as L=T-V, cannot be derived but is defined based on the kinetic energy (T) and potential energy (U) of a system. The intuition behind this formulation is crucial, as it allows for the correct application of the Euler-Lagrange equations to derive equations of motion. The potential energy U is particularly sensitive, as it is valid only when the classical system exhibits time-independent interactions, leading to the conservation of total energy. This relationship is further elucidated in "Classical Mechanics" by Taylor, particularly in Chapter 13.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of kinetic energy (T) and potential energy (U)
  • Familiarity with the Euler-Lagrange equations
  • Knowledge of Hamilton's equations
  • Basic concepts of classical mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and application of the Euler-Lagrange equations
  • Explore Hamilton's equations in detail
  • Read "Classical Mechanics" by Taylor, focusing on Chapter 13
  • Investigate the implications of time-independent interactions in classical systems
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, particularly those studying classical mechanics, as well as educators and researchers seeking a deeper understanding of the Lagrangian formulation and its applications in motion equations.

morangta
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Thank you for answering my question about setting the Euler-Langrangian expression to zero separately for each coordinate (ehild ans.=yes). Now my question is: Can the Lagrangian be derived, or is it the expression, when inserted into the Euler-Lagrange equation(s), that gives the correct equation(s) of motion? In other words, you have to be someone like Lagrange to have the intuition from the beginning what to enter into the E-L equations for L?


Homework Equations


L=T-V


The Attempt at a Solution


I think there is no derivation, but I want to be sure. Thank you for reading my question. BTW, I read in the Wikipedia article on 'Lagrangian' that the generalized coordinates used in writing the expression L=T-V do not have to be orthogonal.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To answer your question directly, no, the Lagrangian cannot be derived. It is defined as T - U. However, I think the better question is to ask why the quantity T - U should be of any interest at all. The Lagrangian turns out to be interesting simply because it works - I guess there is a sense in which Lagrange had to have some sense of intuition here.
 
Thank you for answering my question about the Lagrangian L=T-V. Yes, there does not seem to be anything intuitive about it.
 
Let's just say the the 'U' is the only sensitive point of L = T-U, because it makes sense iff the classical system has time-independent interactions. Then the observable total energy is conserved which makes us conclude that U is the potential energy.
 
Thank you, dextercioby, but I did not understand your explanation. Am working at a very basic level here.
Regards, Ted.
 
I believe Dextercioby was pointing out that when our coordinates are "natural", that is, the relation between the generalized coordinates and underlying cartesian coordinates are independent of time, the observable total energy H = T + U. Additionally, if H is indep. of t, then it is conserved. Thus the U, in H = T + U, will correspond exactly to the potential energy in L = T - U. This is all derivable from Hamilton's equations. Classical Mechanics by Taylor, ch 13 explains this very well if you are curious.
 
OK, tannerbk. Thank you for the reply.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
25
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K