Can the Other Eigenvalue Be Measured After an Initial Measurement?

mangokiller
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
A ket is expanded as \vert \nu \rangle = c_1\vert \nu_1\rangle+c_2\vert \nu_{2}\rangle.

A measurement results in the eigenvalue a1. Is it possible to measure the other eigenvalue a2 at a time t after the first measurement?

Could I write something like

\vert \psi(t)\rangle = e^{-i \hat H t / \hbar}\vert \psi(0) \rangle =e^{-i \hat H t / \hbar}\vert \nu_1 \rangle= e^{-i \hat H t / \hbar} \big(c_1\vert \nu_1 \rangle+c_2\vert \nu_2\rangle \big) =e^{-i E_1 t / \hbar} c_1\vert \nu_1 \rangle+e^{-i E_2 t / \hbar}c_2\vert \nu_{2}\rangle.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You could measure a2 after the first measurement, but the equations in that last line are not quite right. You cannot expand ## | \nu_1 \rangle ## in terms of itself and ## | \nu_2 \rangle ##, because these vectors are linearly independent of each other. Instead, the time evolution operator could transform ## | \nu_1 \rangle ## into a different vector, which is itself expandable in terms of ## | \nu_1 \rangle ## and ## | \nu_2 \rangle ##. That is, you could have ## e^{-i\hat{H}t/ \hbar} | \nu_1 \rangle = c_1 | \nu_1 \rangle + c_2 | \nu_2 \rangle ##. Of course, this assumes that the two eigenstates form a basis, so that any state can be expanded in terms of them.
 
mangokiller said:
A ket is expanded as \vert \nu \rangle = c_1\vert \nu_1\rangle+c_2\vert \nu_{2}\rangle.

A measurement results in the eigenvalue a1. Is it possible to measure the other eigenvalue a2 at a time t after the first measurement?

It depends on what operator ##\vert \nu_1 \rangle## and ##\vert \nu_2 \rangle## are eigenstates of. If that operator commutes with the Hamiltonian, then the answer is no; if it does not, the answer is yes.

Even though the initial state would have been \vert \nu \rangle = c_1\vert \nu_1\rangle+c_2\vert \nu_{2}\rangle, after a measurement produces the result ##a_1## (and assuming that that's the eigenvalue associated with ##\vert \nu_1 \rangle##) the state is going to be ##\psi = \vert \nu_1 \rangle##, so that's the state that you want to be evolving forward in time.
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top