Can the Peclet Number Control Diffusion in Nanoscale Laminar Flow Experiments?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ponjavic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Diffusion
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on an experiment involving laminar flow of water with a dye solvent, focusing on maintaining horizontal velocity of dye particles while minimizing diffusion. The Peclet number is suggested as a potential tool to determine the ratio of convection to diffusion, which could help in selecting appropriate flow rates and channel dimensions. However, concerns are raised about the effectiveness of this approach at the nanoscopic scale, where maintaining variations below 5nm over 50nm may challenge the continuum approximation. The feasibility of using the Peclet number in this context is questioned, indicating potential limitations in practical application. Overall, the experiment faces significant challenges due to the scale of the particles involved.
ponjavic
Messages
221
Reaction score
0
I am going to run an experiment where I have a laminar flow of water with a dye solvent.

It is necessary that the velocity of the dye particles is mostly in the horisontal directions. Naturally particles will diffuse but my questions is how I can ascertain that this is kept below some prerequisite.

I assume there should be some dimensional number telling me for example the ratio of convection/diffusion (thinking Peclet?) and using this I can choose my flow rate and channel dimension to keep diffusion below the required number. However, will this work in practice?

I am looking at particles at a nanoscopic scale where variations in y must be kept below ~5nm over a distance of ~50nm.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you are going to have a problem because the continuum approximation breaks down at those scales. You can try to use (for example) the Peclet number, but I don't think it will work that well.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top