Can the speed of sound in air be faster?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the question of whether the speed of sound in air can be increased by manipulating the motion of air molecules, particularly through the application of force or energy. Participants explore various factors affecting sound propagation, including temperature, molecular interactions, and the nature of sound as a macroscopic phenomenon.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that increasing the speed of air molecules through force could lead to faster sound propagation.
  • Others argue that while sound speed increases with temperature due to faster molecular motion, any additional speed from collisions with a high-speed object dissipates quickly among many molecules, resulting in no significant change in sound speed.
  • A participant mentions that louder sounds correspond to larger amplitudes of molecular displacement rather than increased speed of sound.
  • Another viewpoint suggests that sound is a macroscopic effect driven by pressure variations, and affecting individual molecules does not translate to a significant change in sound speed.
  • One participant notes that the average speed of air molecules at standard conditions is around 500 m/s, and sound waves add only a small oscillatory speed on top of this thermal motion.
  • Another participant introduces the idea that different gas mixtures, such as 'heliox' or hydrogen-based atmospheres, can have higher speeds of sound compared to regular air.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the mechanisms affecting sound speed, with no consensus reached on whether manipulating air molecules can effectively increase the speed of sound. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the impact of molecular interactions versus macroscopic pressure variations.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the complexity of sound propagation, indicating that factors such as temperature, density, and the medium's properties play significant roles. There are also references to specific calculations and relationships between sound intensity and velocity amplitude, which remain open to interpretation.

yosimba2000
Messages
206
Reaction score
9
Sound is vibration of air molecules knocking into each other. Intuitively, it seems the faster a molecule travels before hitting another, the faster the propagation of sound.

Can't you hit air molecules harder, so the air molecules will travel faster and spend less time between collisions, and hence the sound will travel faster?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hmm. I don't think so. While the speed of sound in a gas increases with higher temperatures because the molecules are moving faster, I believe that any increase in the speed of the particles from collisions with a high speed object is quickly lost as the energy is spread out over large numbers of molecules moving in many different directions. In other words, the molecules bounce off of the object and quickly impact nearby air molecules, which are then scattered in random directions.
 
yosimba2000 said:
Can't you hit air molecules harder, so the air molecules will travel faster and spend less time between collisions, and hence the sound will travel faster?

no, that just produces a louder sound

you can prove that yourself
 
yosimba2000 said:
Can't you hit air molecules harder, so the air molecules will travel faster and spend less time between collisions, and hence the sound will travel faster?

Yes, in theory. I, however, cannot generate enough heat through my mouth to change the temperature a significant amount that the change in speed is noticeable.
 
davenn said:
no, that just produces a louder sound

you can prove that yourself

I thought louder sound just means the air molecules travel further from equilibrium, AKA larger amplitude?

Drakkith said:
Hmm. I don't think so. While the speed of sound in a gas increases with higher temperatures because the molecules are moving faster, I believe that any increase in the speed of the particles from collisions with a high speed object is quickly lost as the energy is spread out over large numbers of molecules moving in many different directions. In other words, the molecules bounce off of the object and quickly impact nearby air molecules, which are then scattered in random directions.

Ok, so there is by some mechanism that sort of prevents the air molecules from speeding up too fast. But what if I push the air molecules slowly? Is there some mechanism which keeps air molecules from going too slowly?
 
yosimba2000 said:
I thought louder sound just means the air molecules travel further from equilibrium, AKA larger amplitude?

think about it ... I even said you could prove it for yourself
tap a piece of metal, then hit it hard. What is the difference ? the only difference is in the loudness of the sound

The speed of sound is constant in a specific medium. But can be a different speed in different mediums.
Generally higher density mediums will have a higher speed ... eg speed of sound is faster in water or rock than it is in air. Density isn't the only factor tho ...

https://www.nde-ed.org/EducationResources/HighSchool/Sound/speedinmaterials.htm

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/Tables/Soundv.htmlDave
 
Last edited:
yosimba2000 said:
Ok, so there is by some mechanism that sort of prevents the air molecules from speeding up too fast. But what if I push the air molecules slowly? Is there some mechanism which keeps air molecules from going too slowly?

They're already moving quickly, bouncing around all over the place. Moving an object slowly doesn't change that.
 
I think the crucial difference here is that you are talking about molecular interactions, but sound is a much more macroscopic effect that happens through pressure variations. You may be able to affect a small number of molecules, but that in the end just translates into a minute increase in pressure that then propagates on with the usual speed. As pointed out, you have to affect the medium as a whole.
 
The molecules of air are already moving in the absence of sound. If anything, this speed can be related to the speed of sound in the medium. For air the in standard condition this average speed is about 500 m/s.
As you increase the temperature, the thermal speed increases and so does the speed of sound in air.

Now, when you excite a sound wave in air, the molecules gain some extra speed, on top of their thermal motion speed. This is not a constant value but its value oscillates, like the other parameters of the wave (pressure, displacement The relationship between sound intensity and the velocity amplitude is
$$ I= \frac{\rho_0 c v^2}{2} $$
where I is the intensity in W/m^2, ## \rho_0 ## is the density of the medium, c is the speed of sound and v is the maximum value of the extra velocity induced by the sound wave.
For a loud sound of 100 dB, the intensity is ## 10^{-2} W/m^2 ## (in air) and one gets ##v \approx 7 mm/s ##.
So it is quite clear that this is negligible when compared with the actual speeds of the molecules which is actually responsible for the speed of the propagation.
Even for a sound that is at the pain threshold (about 130 dB) the extra speed is just a fraction of m/s.
 
  • #10
A saturation diver's 'heliox' air-mix has a significantly higher speed of sound than the usual stuff. Further afield, the speed of sound in a hydrogen-based atmosphere is even faster...

IIRC, you can have a non-explosive yet breathable hydrogen + helium + oxygen mix. Speed of sound should be significantly faster than in 'heliox' but due care, please ??
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K