Sound waves: why do air molecules oscillate?

Click For Summary
Air molecules oscillate and influence each other to create sound waves when a drum is struck, as the membrane pushes adjacent molecules back and forth. While students may visualize these interactions as collisions like marbles, the reality involves electromagnetic interactions and the Pauli exclusion principle, which prevent direct contact. The mean free path of air molecules at atmospheric pressure allows for numerous collisions, facilitating sound propagation at the speed of sound. Understanding that sound waves represent pressure oscillations rather than direct molecular oscillations is crucial for students. This discussion emphasizes the importance of teaching the underlying principles of molecular interactions in sound wave formation.
  • #31
Nugatory said:
The air molecules aren’t oscillating, the air pressure is oscillating.
The molecules have a huge range of velocities; it's just the average of all the molecules' motions in a local region that's the density (pressure) and motion in the macroscopic sense.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
sophiecentaur said:
The molecules have a huge range of velocities; it's just the average of all the molecules' motions in a local region that's the density (pressure) and motion in the macroscopic sense.
Yes. We plot the pressure at a point and we get a nice sinusoidal function of time, but that is a macroscopic phenomenon that emerges from averaging the much less orderly movement of the molecules. That orderly sinusoidal pressure oscillation does not imply a similar oscillation of the air molecules; they aren’t swaying back and forth in unison like a line of dancers with locked arms.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes Herman Trivilino, anorlunda and sophiecentaur
  • #33
Nugatory said:
Yes. We plot the pressure at a point and we get a nice sinusoidal function of time, but that is a macroscopic phenomenon that emerges from averaging the much less orderly movement of the molecules.
Electric current is an even stronger analogy. The electrons move in every direction and bounce off the atoms, but the average of all their motions gives the direction and magnitude of current. Even in AC current, the electrons do not wiggle back and forth in unison.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and sophiecentaur
  • #34
Actually, I think the marble analogy is quite a good one. There is this famous model of balls in a container whose bottom vibrates rapidly so that the balls jump around wildly. Would be interesting to see whether you can even simulate a wave when also one of the side walls is made to oscillate albeit more slowly.
 
  • #35
DrDu said:
Actually, I think the marble analogy is quite a good one. There is this famous model of balls in a container whose bottom vibrates rapidly so that the balls jump around wildly. Would be interesting to see whether you can even simulate a wave when also one of the side walls is made to oscillate albeit more slowly.
There are some good school models of kinetic behavior in gases but there are also some really poor ones with motors and rubber diaphragms which clatter a lot but their ‘wave’ patterns are mainly in one’s imagination. I suspect that small ball bearings in a container, excited and kept up by a high power piston / actuator using pink noise, would work well. But it would cost more than a budget level school demo.
 
  • #36
DrDu said:
Actually, I think the marble analogy is quite a good one.
Yes - you can treat gas molecule interactions as perfectly elastic hard-sphere collisions and you arrive at pretty much exactly the correct answer (so long as you appropriately scale the sphere radii in your model).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
Replies
23
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
7K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K