MHB Can three tangents to a circle meet at a common point?

  • Thread starter Thread starter poissonspot
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circle
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the possibility of three tangents to a circle meeting at a common point, with the conclusion that such a scenario leads to contradictions. The analysis involves using a unit circle and a point outside it to derive the equations for tangent lines. By examining the discriminant of the resulting quadratic equation, it is shown that there are always two tangent lines for a point outside the circle. The conversation also touches on alternative methods, such as vector algebra, to explore the problem further. The participants express interest in additional solutions to the question.
poissonspot
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
I considered the question of whether three tangents to the circle could meet at a common point and only came up with a contradiction by lengthy constructive means.
Circles are "nice", so there must be some clever ways of showing this fact that given a point outside the circle there are two tangent lines to the circle passing through this point. Any ideas? Thanks mucho,
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You could, without loss of generality, use a unit circle, and a point on the $y$-axis outside of the circle $(0,b)$ where $1<b$.

The equation of the circle is:

$$x^2+y^2=1$$

The equation of the tangent lines is:

$$y=mx+b$$

Substitute for $y$ from the line into the circle:

$$x^2+(mx+b)^2=1$$

$$x^2+m^2x^2+2bmx+b^2=1$$

$$\left(m^2+1 \right)x^2+(2bm)x+\left(b^2-1 \right)=0$$

Now, by analyzing the discriminant, we find:

$$\Delta=(2bm)^2-4\left(m^2+1 \right)\left(b^2-1 \right)$$

$$\Delta=4\left(b^2m^2-b^2m^2+m^2-b^2+1 \right)$$

$$\Delta=4\left(m^2-b^2+1 \right)$$

We see that with $1<b$, there will be two real values of $m$, given by:

$$m=\pm\sqrt{b^2-1}$$

This implies there are two tangent lines:

$$y=\pm\sqrt{b^2-1}x+b$$
 
MarkFL said:
You could, without loss of generality, use a unit circle, and a point on the $y$-axis outside of the circle $(0,b)$ where $1<b$.

The equation of the circle is:

$$x^2+y^2=1$$

The equation of the tangent lines is:

$$y=mx+b$$

Substitute for $y$ from the line into the circle:

$$x^2+(mx+b)^2=1$$

$$x^2+m^2x^2+2bmx+b^2=1$$

$$\left(m^2+1 \right)x^2+(2bm)x+\left(b^2-1 \right)=0$$

Now, by analyzing the discriminant, we find:

$$\Delta=(2bm)^2-4\left(m^2+1 \right)\left(b^2-1 \right)$$

$$\Delta=4\left(b^2m^2-b^2m^2+m^2-b^2+1 \right)$$

$$\Delta=4\left(m^2-b^2+1 \right)$$

We see that with $1<b$, there will be two real values of $m$, given by:

$$m=\pm\sqrt{b^2-1}$$

This implies there are two tangent lines:

$$y=\pm\sqrt{b^2-1}x+b$$

Thanks, this is close to how I approached the problem. I used vector algebra though instead and solved for points where the dot product was equal to zero.

btw, I'm still interested in other solutions if anyone else is. Thx again,
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top