Can Two Equal-Mass Planets Share a Satellite?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Semaphia
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Satellites Weird
AI Thread Summary
Two equal-mass planets can share a satellite by placing it in a large orbit around their center of mass, similar to trinary star systems. The satellite's orbit can be non-circular due to the gravitational influence of both planets, which can perturb its trajectory. The stability of such an orbit depends on the relative distances and energies involved, as well as the angular momentum of the satellite. While unusual orbits are possible, they may lead to instability over time. Overall, the dynamics of such a system can be complex and require careful consideration of gravitational interactions.
Semaphia
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
If you had a pair of celestial rotating in a circle, both of equal mass size. Would it be possible for the planets to have a shared satellite?

Thank you for reading, Alex
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Sure. Put the satellite into a large orbit around the centre of mass of the binary system. That's how trinary star systems (such as Centauri) work.

(But you were probably thinking of a satellite whose orbit switches between the two parents, weren't you?)
 
Would you expect the orbit of the satellite to have a less spherical orbit?

Thanks
 
Semaphia said:
Would you expect the orbit of the satellite to have a less spherical orbit?

You mean less circular? Even with one gravitating body, there's no reason a satellite should have to be in a circular orbit. It depends on the relative amounts of energy and angular momentum in the satellite. If the satellite started in a circular orbit about a single body, the addition of another gravitating body would certainly perturb that orbit. The amount it was perturbed would depend upon the relative separations of the satellite and the gravitating bodies.
 
There are weird Newtonian orbits with, for example five bodies, where one body "is dirven to infinity in a finite time". Sorry I don't have a link for this statement, I read the paper about 20 years ago.
 
Okay, thank you very much everyone. Alex
 
wouldn't that be very onstable?
 
Back
Top