Can u-substitution be described as a Jacobian?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Char. Limit
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Jacobian
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
7 replies · 4K views
Char. Limit
Gold Member
Messages
1,222
Reaction score
23
So u-substitution is used to make an effective change of variables in one-dimensional calculus. Jacobian determinants are used to make a change of variables in two or higher-dimensional calculus. Can a u-substitution be thought of as a one-dimensional Jacobian determinant?

And on an entirely unrelated note, does anyone know how to make vertical dots in matrix? I was going to draw out the Jacobian determinant, but I couldn't figure that out.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can think of it as the determinant of a 1x1 Jacobian matrix if you want. But apart from telling you that single-variable calculus is consistent with multiple-variable calculus, I'm not sure what that buys you.

does anyone know how to make vertical dots in matrix?

\vdots.
 
It's always nice to know that things are consistent between the two areas, though. Thanks!
 
micromass said:
What kind of "vertical dots"?? And did you type "matrix" instead of "LaTeX"??

Typo, and, well, ellipses, but vertical, not horizontal. Like this:

[tex]\vdots[/tex]
 
micromass said:
Did you just answer your own question?? :smile: Yes, vdots is the way to type vertical ellipses. And ddots is the way to type diagonal ellipses.

I got vdots from AlephZero above, and ddots from you! Now I can type out n-size matrices!