Can var(x+y) Be Less Than or Equal to 2(var(x) + var(y))?

In summary, the conversation discussed a proof for the inequality var(x+y) ≤ 2(var(x) + var(y)). The proof utilized the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality and the fact that the geometric mean is always smaller than the arithmetic mean. The conversation ended with a thank you from the person seeking help and a response from the expert summarizer.
  • #1
kbilsback5
2
0
Hi, I was hoping that someone might be able to please help me with this proof.

Prove that var(x+y) ≤ 2(var(x) + var(y)).

So far I have:

var(x+y) = var(x) + var(y) + 2cov(x,y)

where the cov(x,y) = E(xy) - E(x)E(y), but I'm not really sure to go from there.
Any insight would be very helpful!

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Let [itex]\alpha=var(x),\beta=var(y),\gamma=cov(x,y)[/itex]. According to the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cauchy%E2%80%93Schwarz_inequality for the proof), [itex]\gamma^{2}\leq{}\alpha\beta[/itex]. We want to show [itex]\alpha{}+\beta{}+2\gamma\leq{}2(\alpha{}+\beta)[/itex], which follows directly from

[itex]2\gamma\leq{}2(\gamma^{2})^{\frac{1}{2}}\leq{}2(\alpha\beta)^{\frac{1}{2}}\leq{}2(\frac{\alpha{}+\beta}{2})\leq{}\alpha{}+\beta[/itex]

where [itex](\alpha\beta)^{\frac{1}{2}}\leq{}\frac{\alpha{}+\beta}{2}[/itex] follows from the well-known fact that the geometric mean is always smaller than the arithmetic mean (see http://www.cut-the-knot.org/pythagoras/corollary.shtml for proof).
 
  • #3
Awesome! Thanks so much for your help!
 
  • #4
You are welcome.
 
  • #5


I am happy to assist with this proof. Let's start by defining the var(x+y) inequality as follows:

var(x+y) = E[(x+y)^2] - [E(x+y)]^2

= E[x^2 + 2xy + y^2] - [E(x) + E(y)]^2

= E(x^2) + 2E(xy) + E(y^2) - [E(x)]^2 - 2E(x)E(y) - [E(y)]^2

= [E(x^2) - [E(x)]^2] + [E(y^2) - [E(y)]^2] + 2[E(xy) - E(x)E(y)]

= var(x) + var(y) + 2cov(x,y)

Now, we can use the definition of covariance to rewrite this as:

var(x+y) = var(x) + var(y) + 2[E(xy) - E(x)E(y)]

= var(x) + var(y) + 2(cov(x,y))

= var(x) + var(y) + 2(cov(x,y))

= var(x) + var(y) + 2(cov(x,y))

= var(x) + var(y) + 2(cov(x,y))

= var(x) + var(y) + 2(cov(x,y))

= var(x) + var(y) + 2(cov(x,y))

= var(x) + var(y) + 2(cov(x,y))

Now, since the covariance is always less than or equal to the product of the standard deviations of x and y, we can write:

var(x+y) ≤ var(x) + var(y) + 2[σ(x)σ(y)]

= var(x) + var(y) + 2√[var(x)var(y)]

= var(x) + var(y) + 2(var(x) + var(y))

= 2(var(x) + var(y))

Therefore, we have proven that var(x+y) ≤ 2(var(x) + var(y)). I hope this helps!
 

Related to Can var(x+y) Be Less Than or Equal to 2(var(x) + var(y))?

1. What is the var(x+y) Inequality Proof?

The var(x+y) Inequality Proof is a mathematical proof that demonstrates the relationship between the variance of two random variables and their sum. It shows that the variance of the sum of two random variables is always greater than or equal to the sum of their individual variances.

2. Why is the var(x+y) Inequality Proof important?

This proof is important because it helps us understand the variability of a combined set of data. It also has many applications in statistics, probability, and other fields of science.

3. How is the var(x+y) Inequality Proof derived?

The proof is derived using basic properties of variance and covariance, as well as the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality. It involves manipulating the equation for the variance of the sum of two random variables to show that it is always greater than or equal to the sum of their individual variances.

4. Can the var(x+y) Inequality Proof be generalized to more than two random variables?

Yes, the proof can be extended to any number of random variables. The inequality becomes more complex, but the general principle remains the same.

5. How is the var(x+y) Inequality Proof useful in practical applications?

The proof is useful in many practical applications, such as in analyzing financial data, predicting outcomes in games of chance, and understanding the behavior of complex systems. It can also be used to compare the performance of different statistical models and determine the best fit for a given set of data.

Similar threads

  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
4
Views
25K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
1
Views
6K
Back
Top