Can We Build a Bicycle That Uses Compressed Air for Energy?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Apache
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bicycle Build
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility of building a bicycle that utilizes compressed air as an energy source, exploring the conversion of mechanical energy to electrical energy and then to compressed air. Participants consider various aspects including efficiency, practicality, and alternative energy storage methods.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes a design where mechanical energy from pedaling is converted to electrical energy via a dynamo, stored in a capacitor, and then used to power a compressor that stores compressed air.
  • Another participant expresses skepticism about the efficiency of the proposed system, noting the multiple energy conversions involved and suggesting that a flywheel or windup spring might be simpler and more efficient.
  • Concerns are raised about the overall weight of the assembly, which could make the bicycle cumbersome compared to traditional alternatives like using a battery and electric motor.
  • One participant discusses the idea of diverting energy from pedaling to store it for later use, suggesting that this could make climbing hills easier but would generally make the ride harder overall.
  • Another participant suggests that energy could be stored from braking and free-wheeling down hills, potentially offsetting the energy cost of climbing hills.
  • There is a suggestion to explore existing electric bike designs that might incorporate energy storage from surplus motion.
  • Concerns are raised about the practicality of using flywheels, particularly regarding their impact on maneuverability and the potential hazards of compressed air tanks in the event of a crash.
  • A participant proposes using a permanent magnet direct current (PMDC) motor to generate electricity while pedaling, suggesting ultracapacitors as a lightweight energy storage alternative.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the feasibility and efficiency of the proposed bicycle design. There is no consensus on the best approach, with multiple competing ideas regarding energy storage methods and the practicality of the compressed air system.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight various limitations, including concerns about energy loss during conversion processes, the weight of components, and the potential risks associated with using compressed air tanks. The discussion remains open-ended with unresolved technical details and assumptions about efficiency and practicality.

Apache
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Can I ask you about some opinions?

We desired to build a bicycle.
That is we convert our mechanical energy to electricity energy and stored in capacitor by dynamo.
Then when it reaches certain value we discharge it and connected to the portable air compressor.
The electricty drive the compressor to suck in the air and compressed it to high pressure air that is stored inside the gas tank.
When the gas tank is charged, the high pressure air is discharged and push the piston that is connected to the crankshaft that convert linear motion to circular motion hence drive bicycle's rear wheel.
This help to save energy for long distance traveling and slope difficulty.

Is it a possible and workable idea?

Thanks ya!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org


I'm sure you could make it workable but I think there's a lot of places where energy is lost meaning the efficiency of the device. You're going from ME to EE to capacitor to compressing air to discharging air to pushing a piston to spinning a drive shaft.

I do like the idea of converting thru all these different type kind like a rube-goldberg machine.

Wouldn't it be simpler if you used a flywheel or a windup spring to store your ME directly?
 


Yea, it would make for an interesting and probably exciting-to-build project, but it would be horribly inefficient compared to the alternatives (alternator charges a battery, battery powers an electric motor when needed).

It's workable, sure, but keep in mind that the assembly is going to be heavy, heavy, heavy for a bicycle.
 
I read this a little differently ... the basic concept is to divert some of the energy pedalling the bike to be stored for later use. This makes the bike harder to pedal normally and you won't get all the diverted energy back later. Even if the machine to do the diverting, storage, etc., were perfect, and could be constructed so as to add no mass to the bike, the rider would still lose overall compared with not having the device.

At best you are making hills easier (on a long ride) at the expense of making the ride harder overall. There may be some attraction is the ride is almost all flat with a few hills...

Another way to think, though, is to divert some energy from braking and free-wheeling down hills, to some storage device... Here, the first hill costs you - but part of that cost makes all subsequent hills easier without a penalty on normal riding.

How does that sound to you?
 
Simon Bridge said:
I read this a little differently ... the basic concept is to divert some of the energy pedalling the bike to be stored for later use. This makes the bike harder to pedal normally and you won't get all the diverted energy back later. Even if the machine to do the diverting, storage, etc., were perfect, and could be constructed so as to add no mass to the bike, the rider would still lose overall compared with not having the device.

At best you are making hills easier (on a long ride) at the expense of making the ride harder overall. There may be some attraction is the ride is almost all flat with a few hills...

Another way to think, though, is to divert some energy from braking and free-wheeling down hills, to some storage device... Here, the first hill costs you - but part of that cost makes all subsequent hills easier without a penalty on normal riding.

How does that sound to you?

Thats a good way to look at it. The fly wheel approach works well in this scheme.
 
One of these...
http://www.electricbikes.co.nz/
... with the ability to charge the battery off surplus motion?
Wonder what it would take... I looked for, but did not find, a bike that does that.
 
A flywheel with enough mass and spin to be of any measurable use would make turning the bicycle very difficult. It would probably be a much bigger hassle than it's worth to you in energy savings.
 
Huh - mount the flywheel horizontally?
Use two, counter-rotating, flywheels?
May be worth doing the math - how much energy are we talking about?

Use a different energy store method?
 
If you're using electricity anywhere in the system, why not use a PMDC motor (which, by its very nature, produces electricity when turned by an outside force) and store power in an ultracapacitor or similar? It's low power, but rapidly recharges, and has a power to weight ratio that's remarkably good.
Compressed air - you need a fairly large, heavy tank, which if it bursts, will be no more than two feet (60 cm) from your legs and groin. Flywheels would make the bike hard to turn. You might want to pick a method of storing energy that's not prone to catastrophic release if the bike crashes or is dumped.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K