Low temperature production with compressed air

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the production of low temperatures using compressed air, particularly comparing the cooling effects of releasing compressed air directly versus through a turbine that generates electricity. Participants explore the implications of these methods on temperature changes and efficiency in thermal power plants.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that releasing compressed air through a turbine will produce colder air compared to direct release, as energy is converted into electricity, potentially reducing the overall energy available for heating.
  • Others argue that while the cylinder may cool down, the surrounding room will heat up, resulting in no net temperature change unless heat is removed from the room.
  • A participant suggests that using compressed air to lower the temperature at the condenser in thermal power plants could increase efficiency and output.
  • Another participant questions how lowering the condenser temperature would increase efficiency, suggesting that raising the maximum temperature would be more beneficial.
  • Some participants assert that increasing the efficiency of thermal systems can be achieved by either raising the boiler temperature or lowering the condenser temperature, with a focus on controlling pressure at the condenser.
  • There is a discussion about the role of turbines, with one participant stating that turbines convert pressure to work rather than heat, and that both methods of releasing air would ultimately reach the same end state under ideal conditions.
  • Another participant highlights the importance of superheating steam in thermal power plants to enhance efficiency, arguing that this process increases the mean temperature of heat addition.
  • Some participants clarify that while turbines convert pressure into mechanical work, the advantage of superheating is to improve steam quality and pressure during expansion.
  • There is a contention regarding the conversion of additional heat into dynamic pressure within turbines, with one participant expressing skepticism about this process.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views on the effectiveness of different methods for producing cold and increasing efficiency in thermal systems. The discussion remains unresolved, with no consensus reached on the optimal approach or the implications of the various arguments presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various thermodynamic principles and processes, but there are limitations in the assumptions made regarding the conditions of the systems being discussed, such as the pressure and temperature relationships in thermal cycles.

pranj5
Messages
385
Reaction score
5
Suppose, there are two cylinders of compressed gas, say air. Both are at same temperature and pressure and the amount too is same.
Now, contents of both are released but in a different way. One has been released directly and the other has been released through compressed air turbine having a generator attached to it. Therefore, some amount of power/electricity has been generated by the second. I want to know which one will be able to produce more cold.
Common sense tells that it's the second because by this process that dynamic energy of the compressed air has been converted into power/electricity and it should has lesser energy than the first where the velocity of release has been converted into random motion of molecules i.e. heat.
Am I right or wrong?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Good question ! ...I have some thoughts ...

If a cylinder is inside a room and contents are emptied into this closed room , the cylinder will be cooler but the room would have heated up , no net temperature change.

If a turbine is connected and electricity (heat) is taken out of the room by wires then surely this room will be cooler than the first .
 
oz93666 said:
Good question ! ...I have some thoughts ...

If a cylinder is inside a room and contents are emptied into this closed room , the cylinder will be cooler but the room would have heated up , no net temperature change.

If a turbine is connected and electricity (heat) is taken out of the room by wires then surely this room will be cooler than the first .
Well, that's the same as mine. Glad to know that I have been supported by at least one. But, I want more to be sure.
Actually, I have come up with an idea of increasing the efficiency of thermal power plants and it suddenly struck my mind if the temperature at the Condenser section is lowered, the efficiency and output can be increased. Now, if we use compressed air to rotate a turbine and then use that colder air to create lower temperature at the Condenser; I am sure that the increase in output will outrun the power needed to compress air or other gaseous fluid.
 
Last edited:
I'm not sure how lowering the temperature of the condenser would increase efficiency , unless it allowed use of a different working fluid with a lower boiling point ( practically impossible)...after all , we only need to condense steam to water at 100C and pump it back to the boiler , very easy.

Raising the the max temp.would increase efficiency.
 
That's very basic physics. You can increase the efficiency of thermal based system by either increasing temperature at the Boiler or by decreasing temperature at the Condenser. Pressure at the Condenser can be varied and therefore we can control the temperature at the Condenser and engineers often try to reduce the pressure as much as possible so that efficiency can be increased.
 
pranj5 said:
Common sense tells that it's the second because by this process that dynamic energy of the compressed air has been converted into power/electricity and it should has lesser energy than the first where the velocity of release has been converted into random motion of molecules i.e. heat.

Turbines don't convert heat to work, they convert pressure to work. It seems to me the best an expansion cycle can do (regardless of whether it's a turbine or expansion valve) is follow an isentropic expansion curve. In that case from the same starting point they will both result in the same end state. In practice the turbine will have an efficiency associated with it that will result in a state slightly off of isentropic, but there isn't really a way to calculate the efficiency of a valve since it doesn't produce work. In any case, they will best-case result in the same end-state.
 
At this wiki page one steam turbine, it has been clearly said that the steam gains velocity by passing through a nozzle shaped path inside the turbine that is called the stator. That means not only the pressure, but also the heat of the steam itself has also been converted into work inside the turbine, to precise at the stator section.
If just pressure will be enough, then why steam is superheated in thermal power plants to get higher efficiency?
 
pranj5 said:
That's very basic physics. You can increase the efficiency of thermal based system by either increasing temperature at the Boiler or by decreasing temperature at the Condenser. Pressure at the Condenser can be varied and therefore we can control the temperature at the Condenser and engineers often try to reduce the pressure as much as possible so that efficiency can be increased.

You're right ...I had assumed the final exhaust steam pressure was atmospheric ,... but from wikepedia .."The exhausted steam is at a pressure well below atmospheric,"...
 
pranj5 said:
If just pressure will be enough, then why steam is superheated in thermal power plants to get higher efficiency?

This answer is easily answered with a Google search:

http://web.mit.edu/16.unified/www/FALL/thermodynamics/notes/node66.html
web.mit.edu said:
[In a superheated Rankine Cycle] The heat addition is continued past the point of vapor saturation, in other words the vapor is heated so that its temperature is higher than the saturation temperature associated with . This does several things. First, it increases the mean temperature at which heat is added, http://web.mit.edu/16.unified/www/FALL/thermodynamics/notes/img1161.png , thus increasing the efficiency of the cycle. Second is that the quality of the two-phase mixture during the expansion is higher with superheating, so that there is less moisture content in the mixture as it flows through the turbine. (The moisture content at http://web.mit.edu/16.unified/www/FALL/thermodynamics/notes/img257.png is less than that at http://web.mit.edu/16.unified/www/FALL/thermodynamics/notes/img1166.png .) This is an advantage in terms of decreasing the mechanical deterioration of the blading.
 
  • #10
Thank you Mech_Engineer, the part that you have posted clearly supports my claim. Increasing temperature i.e. superheating steam means increasing efficiency and that will lead to higher output. In short, by increasing temperature we can increase output and that isn't possible until and unless a part of the extra heat will be converted into power.
 
  • #11
It is well-know that superheating in a Rankine Cycle increases efficiency. There are also more complex "superheat with regeneration" Rankine cycles which re-heat the fluid a little in between stages of a multi-stage turbine. The goal is to follow the saturation curve and extract as much energy as possible out of the fluid.

http://web.mit.edu/16.unified/www/FALL/thermodynamics/notes/fig6RankineReheat_web.jpg

pranj5 said:
by increasing temperature we can increase output and that isn't possible until and unless a part of the extra heat will be converted into power.

Keep in mind (as I said before) turbines convert pressure into mechanical work. A turbine does not convert heat directly to work, the advantage of superheating the steam is to increase its pressure (and to increase steam quality after expansion through the turbine). When you think practically about a turbine, it is a set of blades which must be pushed by the working fluid; this net force doesn't come from the fluid's temperature, it comes from pressure.
 
  • #12
In Boilers of thermal power plants, the mode of heating is isobaric i.e. pressure remains constant during compression. Inside the turbine at the stator section, this additional heat will be converted into dynamic pressure and that will drive the blades of the rotors of the next stage. Overall, heat will certainly be converted into energy by a turbine but in the stator section, it has been converted into velocity i.e. dynamic pressure and then into energy by rotating the rotor.
 
  • #13
I'm not aware of any process step which directly converts "additional heat into dynamic pressure." You might read through this section of my previous link to gain some more insight though:

http://web.mit.edu/16.unified/www/FALL/thermodynamics/notes/node66.html
web.mit.edu said:
Figure 8.17: Effect of maximum boiler pressure on Rankine cycle efficiency
http://web.mit.edu/16.unified/www/FALL/thermodynamics/notes/fig6RankineVaryMaxPressure_web.jpg
Another design parameter is the maximum cycle pressure. Figure 8.17 shows a comparison of two cycles with different maximum pressure but the same maximum temperature, which is set by material properties. The average temperature at which the heat is supplied for the cycle with a higher maximum pressure is increased over the original cycle, so that the efficiency increases.
 
  • #14
Some excerpts from wikipedia:
An impulse turbine has fixed nozzles that orient the steam flow into high speed jets. These jets contain significant kinetic energy, which is converted into shaft rotation by the bucket-like shaped rotor blades, as the steam jet changes direction. A pressure drop occurs across only the stationary blades, with a net increase in steam velocity across the stage. As the steam flows through the nozzle its pressure falls from inlet pressure to the exit pressure (atmospheric pressure, or more usually, the condenser vacuum). Due to this high ratio of expansion of steam, the steam leaves the nozzle with a very high velocity. The steam leaving the moving blades has a large portion of the maximum velocity of the steam when leaving the nozzle. The loss of energy due to this higher exit velocity is commonly called the carry over velocity or leaving loss.
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steam_turbine
 
  • #15
By definition a nozzle uses a pressure differential to create velocity. In your provided reference:

Wikipedia.org said:
As the steam flows through the nozzle its pressure falls from inlet pressure to the exit pressure (atmospheric pressure, or more usually, the condenser vacuum). Due to this high ratio of expansion of steam, the steam leaves the nozzle with a very high velocity.

The temperature of the fluid drops as a result of the pressure drop within the turbine as a system as work is generated.
 
  • #16
  • #17
I'm aware of that thread, I see no useful information in that thread w.r.t. the posted question in this thread.

A nozzle by itself will not convert temperature to velocity (a.k.a. kinetic energy). The purpose of a thermodynamic process like the Rankine Cycle as a whole is the conversion of heat (combustion source) to mechanical work.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
7K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
7K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K