Can we see antimatter with photons?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Light Bearer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Antimatter
Light Bearer
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
This is probably a stupid question...but I'm curious to know whether or not we can 'see' antimatter? In the hypothetical situation where enough antimatter comes together to form something macroscopic/doesn't interact with regular matter and destroy itself, could we see it? Would photons (photons are their own antiparticles, right?) interact with antimatter in such a way as to allow it to become visible to our eyes?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
positrons are just as visible as electrons. Photons interact with charge, whether it is matter or 'antimatter'.
 
Light Bearer said:
In the hypothetical situation where enough antimatter comes together to form something macroscopic/doesn't interact with regular matter and destroy itself, could we see it? Would photons (photons are their own antiparticles, right?) interact with antimatter in such a way as to allow it to become visible to our eyes?

For sure! Photons cannot tell the difference between matter and anti-matter; it looks the same to them. If you had an "anti-baseball" it would look just like a regular baseball, so long as it was kept under high vacuum. Of course if you had such a vast amount of anti-matter in your lab you'd be on the edge of blowing up your city.
 
Antimatter is simply anti-electrons, anti-protons and anti-neutrons. As Meir and kurros point out, photons do not know the difference. Neither, in fact, does antimatter. It will happily go about making molecules and baseballs just like matter does. (As long as there's no matter around.) But since we see it with photons, we won't see any difference.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top