Can we use integration by parts for improper integrals?

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
13 replies · 3K views
daudaudaudau
Messages
297
Reaction score
0
What's up with this

[tex] \int_{-\infty}^\infty \sin{x}\frac{1}{x}dx=\pi[/tex]

Now I try integration by parts
[tex] \int_{-\infty}^\infty \sin{x}\frac{1}{x}dx=[-\cos{x}\frac{1}{x}]_{-\infty}^\infty-\int_{-\infty}^\infty \cos{x}\frac{1}{x^2}dx = -\int_{-\infty}^\infty \cos{x}\frac{1}{x^2}dx = \infty[/tex]

Why don't I get the same result?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is a singularity at x=0 which cannot be ignored. To get a clearer picture, carry out the original integral (0,∞) and double it (the integrand is an even function). The integration by parts will now have two ∞'s.
 
Yes that works, but what did I do wrong in my initial calculation? I just used integration by parts.
 
so how did you do the first and last integrals? how do you know the first integral equals pi and how did you integrate cos/x^2
 
Here's a bunch of ways for evaluating int sin(x)/x: http://www.mathlinks.ro/viewtopic.php?t=197640

The last integral is obviously divergent because the integrand diverges as 1/x^2 as x goes to zero. If you're trying to give me a hint, then I think I missed it.
 
um the integrand in

[tex]\int_{-\epsilon}^{\epsilon}\delta(x)dx[/tex]

diverges as x goes to zero as well the integral is 1.

now someone might call b.s. on me because really that's a definition but still my point is you can't reason just cause there's a divergence at some point that the integral around that point diverges (or can you?)
 
ice109 said:
um the integrand in

[tex]\int_{-\epsilon}^{\epsilon}\delta(x)dx[/tex]

diverges as x goes to zero as well the integral is 1.

now someone might call b.s. on me because really that's a definition but still my point is you can't reason just cause there's a divergence at some point that the integral around that point diverges (or can you?)
The "delta function" is not an integrable function.
 
So what's wrong with the way I use integration by parts? :-)
 
So is there some general rule for when integration by parts works and when it fails?
 
What do you mean? I got
[tex] \int_{-\infty}^\infty \sin{x}\frac{1}{x}dx=\pi = -\int_{-\infty}^\infty \cos{x}\frac{1}{x^2}dx = \infty<br /> [/tex]

Somehow it must be wrong to write
[tex] \int_{-\infty}^\infty \sin{x}\frac{1}{x}dx= -\int_{-\infty}^\infty \cos{x}\frac{1}{x^2}dx<br /> [/tex]

but I don't see why, because I just used the formula for integration by parts.
 
tiny-tim said:
No, you also got [-cosx/x]-∞, = [-cosx/x]-∞0 + [-cosx/x]0, = ∞ + ∞.

I guess you are right. I never thought about that. What I have is

[tex] \left[\frac{\cos{x}}{x}\right]_{-\infty}^\infty=\int_{-\infty}^\infty\frac{d}{dx}\frac{\cos{x}}{x}dx = \lim_{a\rightarrow\infty}\int_{c}^a\frac{d}{dx}\frac{\cos{x}}{x}dx+\lim_{b\rightarrow-\infty}\int_{b}^c\frac{d}{dx}\frac{\cos{x}}{x}dx[/tex]

where [itex]c[/itex] is any real constant. This clearly diverges for any [itex]c[/itex] ...