Can we view the string theory as defined on special 2-D time?

Osiris
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Since now time is 2-dimensional, coordinates of points X\mu are dependent on both (\tau1, \tau2), and
if \tau2 is infinite, it's a open string;
if \tau2 is finite, it's a closed string.


How do you think so?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It is so, but it is not a second time, just a parameter, let's call sigma (for "space"). What you say is called the "worldsheet point of view", as oppossed to the 4D (or 10D) "space time point of view".
 
As long as a (any) system has only one past and one future, it will have just one time parameter. There may be theories with signatures like (- - + + +...) - as in F-theory - but that alone does not mean it is a two-timed theory.
 
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2503.09804 From the abstract: ... Our derivation uses both EE and the Newtonian approximation of EE in Part I, to describe semi-classically in Part II the advection of DM, created at the level of the universe, into galaxies and clusters thereof. This advection happens proportional with their own classically generated gravitational field g, due to self-interaction of the gravitational field. It is based on the universal formula ρD =λgg′2 for the densityρ D of DM...
Many of us have heard of "twistors", arguably Roger Penrose's biggest contribution to theoretical physics. Twistor space is a space which maps nonlocally onto physical space-time; in particular, lightlike structures in space-time, like null lines and light cones, become much more "local" in twistor space. For various reasons, Penrose thought that twistor space was possibly a more fundamental arena for theoretical physics than space-time, and for many years he and a hardy band of mostly...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
33
Views
7K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
0
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
41
Views
10K
Back
Top