Can Wien's Law be derived without using Planck's formula?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Jeans
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivation Law
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the derivation of Wien's Law, specifically the Wien distribution law, without referencing Planck's radiation formula. The original derivation of Wien's Law predates Planck's work, published in 1898, where Wien assumed an exponential form for black body radiation, leading to a result proportional to T^4. Despite its historical significance, this derivation was later shown to be incorrect at long wavelengths, necessitating Planck's 1900 solution. The original paper is recommended for further reading to understand the assumptions and context of Wien's findings.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of black body radiation concepts
  • Familiarity with historical physics literature
  • Knowledge of thermodynamic principles related to temperature and energy
  • Basic grasp of mathematical integration techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Read Wien's original paper "On the division of energy in the emission-spectrum of a black body"
  • Study the historical context of black body radiation and its evolution
  • Explore the mathematical derivation of Planck's radiation formula
  • Investigate the implications of Wien's Law in modern physics applications
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, historians of science, and students researching black body radiation and its foundational laws in thermodynamics.

Math Jeans
Messages
347
Reaction score
0
Just for clarification, I am referring to the Wien distribution law, and not Wien's Displacement Law.

I understand the fact that the law can easily be derived by treating is as a high-frequency limit of Planck's radiation formula, however, this is incredibly frustrating to me. Why? Wien's law was derived 4 years BEFORE Planck's radiation formula, and all of the derivations of Wien's law that I can find on the internet are based off of Planck's law.

I'm currently doing a research project on Blackbody radiation, and in order to keep a coherent timeline, I really need a derivation without the use of a formula which did not exist in 1896.

Any thoughts/sources?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is old but in case anyone cares...

The original paper is "On the division of energy in the emission-spectrum of a black body", it's written in english, or was translated and is quite clear and very readable, even for modern readers. He assumes that the form black body radiation formula is an exponential, and integrates out to give something proportional T^4. Believe it or not, with not much else he derives his result, the constants are left to experiment to find. This was published june 1898 and by 1899 it was shown to be incorrect at long wavelegnths. Planck's solution is 1900. Look up the original paper.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K