MHB Can You Balance Two Jobs and Meet Your Weekly Financial Goals?

AI Thread Summary
To balance two jobs and meet weekly financial goals, the constraints are defined by the inequalities x + y ≤ 41 and 6x + 9y ≥ 252, where x represents hours worked in housecleaning and y in sales. The first inequality limits total working hours to 41, while the second ensures a minimum weekly income of $252. To solve these inequalities, one can graph the lines representing each equation and determine the feasible region that satisfies both conditions. The solution set will be in the first quadrant, indicating non-negative hours for both jobs. This approach allows for visualizing the combinations of hours that meet financial and time constraints.
rebo1984
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
You can work a total of no more than 41 hours each week at your two
jobs. Housecleaning pays \$6 per hour and your sales job pays \$9 per hour. You
need to earn at least \$252 each week to pay your bills.

Are the answers:

x+y\le 41

6x+9y\ge252

How would you solve this?

Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
To solve a system of linear inequalities, such as the system we have here:

$$x+y\le41$$

$$2x+3y\ge84$$ (I divided through by 3 to make the numbers smaller)

We observe that the variables represent the number of hours worked, and so we are only interested in non-negative values, so our solution set will be in quadrant I, or along the positive axes.

We begin with the first inequality and consider the equation:

$$x+y=41$$

This line will be the boundary of the solution set of the inequality. To plot the graphs of a line, I like to arrange it in slope-intercept form $y=mx+b$:

$$y=-x+41$$

We immediately see the point $(0,41)$ is on the line. Plot that point. Now, since the slope is -1, we may go one unit to the right and one unit down to the point $(1,40)$. Plot that point, and since the inequality is a weak one, we plot the solid line passing through the two points we plotted.

Now, to see which side of the line the solution set exists, we check a point not on the line to see if it satisfies the inequality or not. It if satisfies the inequality, then we know the solution set is on the same side of the line as our test point. Let's use the origin $(0,0)$...

$$0+0\le41$$

$$0\le41\quad\checkmark$$

This point satisfies the inequality, so we shade underneath the line in the first quadrant up to and including the positive axes:

[DESMOS=-3.332076962397118,46.32304769391533,-4.665236823966467,44.98988783234599]x+y\le41\left\{0\le x\right\}\left\{0\le y\right\}[/DESMOS]

Okay for the second inequality, we write the equation:

$$2x+3y=84$$

Write in slope-intercept form:

$$y=-\frac{2}{3}x+28$$

Plot the $y$-intercept $(0,28)$, then move three units to the right and two units down to the point $(2,25)$ and plot that point, then connect those points with a solid line (weak inequality) and extend them to the positive axes. We'll use the origin again as our test point:

$$2(0)+3(0)\ge84$$

$$0\ge84\quad\xcancel{\checkmark}$$

This point does not satisfy the inequality, so we shade above the line:

[DESMOS=-2.1314516419265574,44.60278332872047,-9.23991795329183,37.49431701735519]2x+3y\ge84\left\{0\le x\right\}\left\{0\le y\right\}[/DESMOS]

We are interested in the set of points that satisfy both inequalities simultaneously, so our plot becomes:

[DESMOS=-1,40,-1,42]0\le x\left\{2x+3y\ge84\right\}\left\{x+y\le41\right\}[/DESMOS]
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top