MHB Can You Balance Two Jobs and Meet Your Weekly Financial Goals?

AI Thread Summary
To balance two jobs and meet weekly financial goals, the constraints are defined by the inequalities x + y ≤ 41 and 6x + 9y ≥ 252, where x represents hours worked in housecleaning and y in sales. The first inequality limits total working hours to 41, while the second ensures a minimum weekly income of $252. To solve these inequalities, one can graph the lines representing each equation and determine the feasible region that satisfies both conditions. The solution set will be in the first quadrant, indicating non-negative hours for both jobs. This approach allows for visualizing the combinations of hours that meet financial and time constraints.
rebo1984
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
You can work a total of no more than 41 hours each week at your two
jobs. Housecleaning pays \$6 per hour and your sales job pays \$9 per hour. You
need to earn at least \$252 each week to pay your bills.

Are the answers:

x+y\le 41

6x+9y\ge252

How would you solve this?

Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
To solve a system of linear inequalities, such as the system we have here:

$$x+y\le41$$

$$2x+3y\ge84$$ (I divided through by 3 to make the numbers smaller)

We observe that the variables represent the number of hours worked, and so we are only interested in non-negative values, so our solution set will be in quadrant I, or along the positive axes.

We begin with the first inequality and consider the equation:

$$x+y=41$$

This line will be the boundary of the solution set of the inequality. To plot the graphs of a line, I like to arrange it in slope-intercept form $y=mx+b$:

$$y=-x+41$$

We immediately see the point $(0,41)$ is on the line. Plot that point. Now, since the slope is -1, we may go one unit to the right and one unit down to the point $(1,40)$. Plot that point, and since the inequality is a weak one, we plot the solid line passing through the two points we plotted.

Now, to see which side of the line the solution set exists, we check a point not on the line to see if it satisfies the inequality or not. It if satisfies the inequality, then we know the solution set is on the same side of the line as our test point. Let's use the origin $(0,0)$...

$$0+0\le41$$

$$0\le41\quad\checkmark$$

This point satisfies the inequality, so we shade underneath the line in the first quadrant up to and including the positive axes:

[DESMOS=-3.332076962397118,46.32304769391533,-4.665236823966467,44.98988783234599]x+y\le41\left\{0\le x\right\}\left\{0\le y\right\}[/DESMOS]

Okay for the second inequality, we write the equation:

$$2x+3y=84$$

Write in slope-intercept form:

$$y=-\frac{2}{3}x+28$$

Plot the $y$-intercept $(0,28)$, then move three units to the right and two units down to the point $(2,25)$ and plot that point, then connect those points with a solid line (weak inequality) and extend them to the positive axes. We'll use the origin again as our test point:

$$2(0)+3(0)\ge84$$

$$0\ge84\quad\xcancel{\checkmark}$$

This point does not satisfy the inequality, so we shade above the line:

[DESMOS=-2.1314516419265574,44.60278332872047,-9.23991795329183,37.49431701735519]2x+3y\ge84\left\{0\le x\right\}\left\{0\le y\right\}[/DESMOS]

We are interested in the set of points that satisfy both inequalities simultaneously, so our plot becomes:

[DESMOS=-1,40,-1,42]0\le x\left\{2x+3y\ge84\right\}\left\{x+y\le41\right\}[/DESMOS]
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top