Can You Compute Compositions f(g(x)) and g(f(x)) with Given Functions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Euphoriet
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Weird
Euphoriet
Messages
105
Reaction score
0
Can you solve such a thing as:
f(g(x)) and g(f(x))

Let f(x) = sqr (4-x)
D=x < or = to 4 right?
and
also Let g(x) = sqr(x-3)

D = x > or = to 3

Can you solve such a thing.. if so how.. if not why not?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
nvm i got it now.. the answer is yest
 
the composition of functions F(G(x)) can be done like this: find G(x) in terms of x, then pretend your result is like 'x' and plug it into F(x) . ultimately the domain and range of your function will change since the new function F(G(x)) will be a totally new function, there may be cases when it is impossible to find F(G(x)).

for example, of F(x) = - \mid x \mid and G(x) = \sqrt{x} in that case you would always have the square root of a negative number, but i don't think that is the case in your question.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
999
Back
Top