Can You Derive Equations Using UAM Principles?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jensgt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    deriving
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 3K views
jensgt
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Can you come up with (i.e. derive) equations 5-1 and 5-2 on your own using UAM equations? Try it


Homework Equations



This is the equation I need to end up at...

R=Vox/g(Voy+(Voy^+2gh)^1/2


The Attempt at a Solution



I am not really sure where to start. I was trying to use the equations for range and height but it does not seem to be getting me anywhere. This is my first physics course.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
welcome to pf!

hi jensgt! welcome to pf! :smile:

(try using the X2 button just above the Reply box :wink:)

don't try to memorise (or use) the range or height equations :wink:, go back to the standard constant acceleration equations, for the x and y directions (separately)

they'll use the same t …

show us what you get :smile:
 
The equations I know are

Vx = Vox + Axt

X = Xo + Voxt + 1/2axt^2

X-Xo = [(Vox + Vx)/2]t

Vx^2 = Vox^2 +2ax(X-Xo)

I am just confused as to where to start. I derived the other one he asked us about this one has me stuck.
 
hi jensgt! :smile:

(just got up :zzz:)
jensgt said:
I am just confused as to where to start.

use x = xo + Vxot + 1/2axt2

and y = yo + Vyot + 1/2ayt2

(obviously, ax = 0) …

show us what you get :smile:

(btw, never use "x" for times, it's too confusing … use "*" instead, or nothing at all! :wink:)