Can you distribute logarithms?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mileena
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Logarithms
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether the equation logb(x + y) = logb(x) + logb(y) is valid. Participants clarify that this equation is incorrect, as logarithms do not distribute over addition. One user mistakenly believed they could distribute logs and tested examples, leading to confusion. The correct logarithmic rules, including the product rule, are reiterated, emphasizing that log(xy) = log(x) + log(y) is valid, while the addition case is not. Ultimately, the consensus is that logarithms cannot be distributed in this manner.
mileena
Messages
129
Reaction score
0
Does anyone know if the following is true:

logb (x + y) = logb x + logb y

Thanks. This isn't homework, but I am just wondering if the following is true. I already know the logarithm product, quotient, and power rules!
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Why don't you try to find a counterexample?
 
Ok, good idea. I don't know how to use a scientific calculator yet to figure out logs, but I know they are online. I will plug in some real numbers to see if the equation s true or not.
 
Ok, I just did, using log 2 and log 3, and then again with log 8 and log 10. It worked! you can distribute logs!

Thanks, and sorry for posting so many questions in one day.
 
mileena said:
Ok, I just did, using log 2 and log 3, and then again with log 8 and log 10. It worked! you can distribute logs!

Thanks, and sorry for posting so many questions in one day.

It shouldn't work :confused:

Can you post what you did?
 
:redface:
 
log(2)=log(1+1)=log(1)+log(1)

Is this true?
 
johnqwertyful said:
log(2)=log(1+1)=log(1)+log(1)

Is this true?

What's the log of 1?
What's the log of 2?
 
Nugatory said:
What's the log of 1?
What's the log of 2?

I think he knows lol. He just asked it to the OP :-p
 
  • #10
micromass said:
I think he knows lol. He just asked it to the OP :-p

Oops - right you are. Sorry about that.
 
  • #11
mileena said:
Does anyone know if the following is true:

logb (x + y) = logb x + logb y

Thanks. This isn't homework, but I am just wondering if the following is true. I already know the logarithm product, quotient, and power rules!


Make and test an example. Imagine your base is 10, and x=100 and y=10,000,000.

log10(100+10000000)=log10(100)+log10(10000000)
Does this make sense? Does this not make sense?
 
  • #12
Log(xy) = log(x) + log(y). Unless xy = x+y, your equation is wrong.
 
  • #13
Hi, sorry for not posting sooner, but I was busy all day and I don't really have Internet access until I get to the library.

Let me also say that I am an idiot!

Yesterday, I said that you could distribute logs, so that:

logb (x + y) = logb (x) + logb (y)

But I made a mistake. Instead of adding, for example, 2 and 3, and taking the log of 5 and comparing that with the sum of log 2 and log 3, I multiplied 2 and 3! Thus I got:

logb x + logb y = logb (xy)

which is, of course, the product rule.
 
  • #14
symbolipoint said:
Make and test an example. Imagine your base is 10, and x=100 and y=10,000,000.

log10(100+10000000)=log10(100)+log10(10000000)
Does this make sense? Does this not make sense?

mathman said:
Log(xy) = log(x) + log(y). Unless xy = x+y, your equation is wrong.

I did not say that the equation was correct. I only presented it, and then asked two questions. I know already that the equation is wrong. mileena already found understanding that was sought.
 
  • #15
@symbolipoint: I think mathman may have been responding to the original post when he was commenting.

@Nugatory: log 1 = 0 and log 2 ≈ 0.6931...

-Junaid :-p
 
  • #16
junaid314159 said:
@symbolipoint: I think mathman may have been responding to the original post when he was commenting.

@Nugatory: log 1 = 0 and log 2 ≈ 0.6931...

-Junaid :-p

mathman, that is possible. I inferred that you may have responded to my post because yours came directly after it, and other interrelations of responses of posts were not clear.

I tried to give an example to be checked and asked if the example made sense.
 
  • #17
symbolipoint said:
mathman, that is possible. I inferred that you may have responded to my post because yours came directly after it, and other interrelations of responses of posts were not clear.

I tried to give an example to be checked and asked if the example made sense.

I was responding to the original post.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top