Can you modify this quote regarding time dilation?

49ers2013Champ
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
The total speed of an object through the dimension of space and the dimension of time equals the speed of light. An object moving through space must subtract from its movement through time for the sum to remain at lightspeed. So an object at the speed of light has all its movement through space and its movement through time must equal zero. Inversly a stationary object has all its movement through time and none through space. Making the quickest way to travel into the future is to stop moving.

What parts of this quote need to be modified?

The last sentence seems completely contrary to how I've understood "going into the future." Is this last sentence correct?

The second sentence, when it uses the word "subtract", is what is hard for me to process. Can someone either modify this or explain it in finer detail? Is there a numeral that can represent one's movement through time? And can it be plugged into an equation that allows for it to be subtracted from or added to the "space numeral" so that the equation always equals the speed of light?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
49ers2013Champ said:
The total speed of an object through the dimension of space and the dimension of time equals the speed of light. An object moving through space must subtract from its movement through time for the sum to remain at lightspeed. So an object at the speed of light has all its movement through space and its movement through time must equal zero. Inversly a stationary object has all its movement through time and none through space. Making the quickest way to travel into the future is to stop moving.

What parts of this quote need to be modified?

The last sentence seems completely contrary to how I've understood "going into the future." Is this last sentence correct?
Whenever you quote something, you should provide the source.

The subject of the quote is Four Velocity. Do a search and you will quickly see the quote is beyond redemption.
 
49ers2013Champ said:
The total speed of an object through the dimension of space and the dimension of time equals the speed of light. An object moving through space must subtract from its movement through time for the sum to remain at lightspeed. So an object at the speed of light has all its movement through space and its movement through time must equal zero. Inversly a stationary object has all its movement through time and none through space. Making the quickest way to travel into the future is to stop moving.

What parts of this quote need to be modified?

The last sentence seems completely contrary to how I've understood "going into the future." Is this last sentence correct?

The second sentence, when it uses the word "subtract", is what is hard for me to process. Can someone either modify this or explain it in finer detail? Is there a numeral that can represent one's movement through time? And can it be plugged into an equation that allows for it to be subtracted from or added to the "space numeral" so that the equation always equals the speed of light?
The quote assumes there is such a thing as speed through space. The only meaningful speeds are those measured against some other object. So two things may have a relative velocity, but they don't have an absolute velocity individually.

As George pointed out, the thing that describes relative velocity is called the 4-velocity. Look it up on Wiki.
 
49ers2013Champ said:
The total speed of an object through the dimension of space and the dimension of time equals the speed of light. An object moving through space must subtract from its movement through time for the sum to remain at lightspeed. So an object at the speed of light has all its movement through space and its movement through time must equal zero. Inversely a stationary object has all its movement through time and none through space. Making the quickest way to travel into the future is to stop moving.
It is a somewhat poetic discussion of the 4-velocity and 'proper time'.
It might be how Lewis Carroll would describe it had he not predated relativity.
The four-velocity is U^{\mu}=(c\gamma,\gamma\bf v). Its square is
U^2=U^\mu U_\mu=c^2\gamma^2-{\bf v}^2\gamma^2=c^2. The square root of this is what the quote calls the "total speed of an object".
The word "subtract" refers to the minus sign for the space part in the 'length' formula. If v=c, then U^2=0, and equals zero as in the quote. "Travel into the future" refers to the increase of the proper time,
d\tau^2=dt^2-d{\bf x}^2. You can see from that equation that d\tau is maximized if \bf dx=0. This means the twin that never moves ages faster.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...

Similar threads

Replies
58
Views
4K
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top