Can you prove the existence of a local minimum between two local maxima?

  • Thread starter Thread starter trap
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Local Minimum
Click For Summary
If a function f is continuous on the interval [c1, c2] and has local maxima at c1 and c2, there must be at least one local minimum in the interval (c1, c2). This is supported by the behavior of the derivative f'(x), which transitions from positive to negative as it moves from c1 to c2. The discussion highlights that even if f is not differentiable, understanding the derivative can aid in grasping the problem. Additionally, it is noted that continuous functions on closed intervals have both global minima and maxima. The conversation emphasizes the importance of proving that c1 and c2 cannot be the only global extrema.
trap
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
Suppose that c1 < c2 and that f takes on local maxima at c1 and c2. Prove that if f is continuous on [c1, c2], then there is at least one c in (c1, c2) at which f takes on a local minimum.

This question seems common sense, but does anyone know how to actually prove this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hint: Sketch the graph of f ' (x). Since f ' ' (c1) < 0 and f ' ' (c2) < 0 the graph must decrease as you move away from x = c1 and toward x = c2. Likewise, the graph must increase as you move away from x = c2 and toward x = c1. Therefore, f ' (x) must pass from a positive value to a negative value somewhere in (c1, c2).
 
Don't forget that f might not be differentiable... though looking at derivatives might jump start your understanding of the problem.


Trap: do you know anything, in general, about the minima of continuous functions on closed intervals?
 
thanks everyone for the responds.

I do not know about the minima of continuous functions on closed intervals, can u provide an answer to this? thanks :smile:
 
Any continuous function on a compact set (such as a closed interval [a, b]) has a global minimum and maximum.

So, for your problem, it would suffice to prove that a and b can't be the (only) global minimum.


I don't know if you've had this theorem yet, though.
 
m...I haven't learned about global min/max theorems, but thanks anyways for your help and explanations.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
30
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K